> I am really confused about Ca2+ vdw radius. According to Aqvist, it should
> be 1.326. But in parm99.dat, it is 1.71. In different paper, different
> values were used. I am wondering which one should be the best in general
> cases.
The e parameter must also be taken into account, and the Aqvist
parameters must be adjusted for Amber combining rules. Search
old postings for Aqvist..
Bill
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to amber.scripps.edu
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo.scripps.edu
Received on Sun Jan 21 2007 - 06:07:26 PST
