HI!
Thanks for your quick response very much!
The g95 is version 0.91. I compiled it with gcc 4.0.3. However, my redhat
linux's gcc is 3.x.x version. So I download gcc core source code (followed
the g95 complie instruction on g95.org). But I did not real install gcc
4.0.3. The g95 works fine. I tested it with a simple "hello world"
application.
Is this ok for g95 and amber9?
Thanks.
Ocean
On 1/2/07, David A. Case <case.scripps.edu> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 02, 2007, Seaclear Theory wrote:
> >
> > I got error when I install amber9. I compile it using g95 and got
> following
> > error mesages:
> >
> > ......
> > ......
> > g95 -c -O3 -fno-second-underscore -march=nocona -ffree-form
> > -I../../sander -o ../obj/random.o ../obj/random.f
> > In file ../obj/random.f:9
> >
> > FUNCTION xrandom(idum)
> > 1
> > Warning (139): Value of function 'xrandom' at (1) is never set
> > In file ../obj/random.f:19
> >
> > FUNCTION irandom(idum,imax)
> > 1
> > Warning (139): Value of function 'irandom' at (1) is never set
> > In file ../obj/random.f:9
> >
> > FUNCTION xrandom(idum)
> > 1
> > In file ../obj/random.f:44
> >
> > sum = sum + xrandom(idum)
> > 2
> > Error: FUNCTION 'xrandom' is of type REAL(4) at (1) and type REAL(8) at
> (2)
> > make[3]: *** [../obj/random.o] Error 1
> > make[3]: Leaving directory `/opt/amber/amber9/src/dcqtp/mod'
> > make[2]: *** [libdivcon.a] Error 2
> > make[2]: Leaving directory `/opt/amber/amber9/src/dcqtp'
> > make[1]: *** [divcon] Error 2
> > make[1]: Leaving directory `/opt/amber/amber9/src/sander'
> > make: *** [serial] Error 2
> >
>
> What does g95 --version report? We compile this code with g95 all the
> time
> (on a variety of platforms) and haven't seen that error....
>
> Having said that, the code in random.F90 does look wrong, but as far as I
> can
> see, never used anywhere anyway. You should be able to go ahead and make
> xrandom() a double precision function.
>
> I'm cc-ing this to the people in Florida, who should look into this: why
> do we
> have Monte Carlo and parameter optimization code that is never
> used? Isn't
> it pretty dangerous to have bogus functions in random.F90? This seems
> like it
> just asking for future bugs.
>
> ...thanks for the report; we'll try to get a bug fix out soon.
>
> ...regards...dac
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> The AMBER Mail Reflector
> To post, send mail to amber.scripps.edu
> To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo.scripps.edu
>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to amber.scripps.edu
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo.scripps.edu
Received on Sun Jan 07 2007 - 06:07:09 PST
