On Wed, Jul 19, 2006, frustrated modeller wrote:
> P.S. I forgot to mention the reason I was trying to use antechamber on the
> new installation of amber9 was due to errors I got on a different machine
> trying to run amber 8 antechamber (which is passing the tests).
> What I was trying to do and what error I got is below.
>
> antechamber -fi pdb -fo prepi -i IPC.1.pdb -o IPC.prep -nc 0 -at amber -c
> bcc -rf IPC.res -rn IPC -s 2
> Running: /data/people/negi/amber8/exe/bondtype -i ANTECHAMBER_BOND_TYPE.AC0
> -o ANTECHAMBER_BOND_TYPE.AC -f ac -j full
> Error: cannot run "/data/people/negi/amber8/exe/bondtype -i
> ANTECHAMBER_BOND_TYPE.AC0 -o ANTECHAMBER_BOND_TYPE.AC -f ac -j full" in
> judgebondtype() of antechamber.c properly, exit
antechamber only works on *single* residues. It is getting quite confused
by the IPC.1.pdb file, which has multiple residues (and hence, several
atoms with the same name.)
>
> Running: $AMBERHOME/exe/divcon
> forrtl: severe (174): SIGSEGV, segmentation fault occurred
It's hard to debug this. Which version of ifort are you using (what is the
output of ifort -V)?
...dac
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to amber.scripps.edu
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo.scripps.edu
Received on Wed Jul 26 2006 - 06:07:12 PDT
