Ross,
> My best advice to you however is that if you have access to Amber 9 you
> should just consider installing this yourself on all the machines you will
> use. Intall it in your own home directory and use this. I recommend that
> anybody running simulations with Amber does this unless they explicitly
> trust the sysadmin of the machine. I.e. if you are using a centrally
> installed program how do you know that the person who installed it ran the
> test suite and verified it worked.
Applying your reasoning to every application on every system (which
is only fair since the user cannot know that _any_ of the centrally
installed programs work properly...) causes interesting situations
when user 1 is complaining that something isn't working and user 2
has no problems and user 3 gets a totally different problem altogether,
all running the "same" program on the same system. (It also wastes
disk space, even if a hundred copies of the AMBER 8 source code only
weigh 3 GB. But extrapolate to a bigger number of users and a
selection of program suites and you will get to a point where it does
make a difference.)
I'd hate to be the sysadmin on your dream system. But to each their own.
--
Atro Tossavainen (Mr.) / The Institute of Biotechnology at
Systems Analyst, Techno-Amish & / the University of Helsinki, Finland,
+358-9-19158939 UNIX Dinosaur / employs me, but my opinions are my own.
< URL : http : / / www . helsinki . fi / %7E atossava / > NO FILE ATTACHMENTS
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to amber.scripps.edu
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo.scripps.edu
Received on Wed Jul 26 2006 - 06:07:06 PDT
