On Tue, Mar 07, 2006, Ilyas Yildirim wrote:
> This means that ntt=3 has some kind of a bug (or if it is called as a bug).
> Hope this can be fixed.
It *is* fixed in Amber 9 sander (combination of irest=0, tempi>0 and
ntt=3 giving different answers on multiple cpus vs. 1 cpu.)
Note that neither the single cpu nor the multiple cpu result is wrong...they
are just different realizations of the pseudo-random number sequence. That's
why I called it a "buglet".
...dac
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to amber.scripps.edu
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo.scripps.edu
Received on Sun Mar 12 2006 - 06:10:13 PST
