On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 05:35:16PM +0100, Andreas Svrcek-Seiler wrote:
> Hi
<...>
> ...yes, it does (though only because I saw it myself an hour ago, not
> because I really know what it means). Anyway, replacing
> the offending expressions by ...(len=*)... allows compiling the files with
> gfortran(4.1) and final result nearly passes a 'make test.serial' for
> amber 9 and therefore presumably for amber8 too.
> Buy the way: completely build amber9 with gcc 4.1 I needed to
> change line 9 $AMBERHOME/src/arpack/stat.h from
> double precision t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5
> to
> real t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5
>
> ...Maybe one of the fortran gurus will also give his opinion.
>
Thanks, the build finished here too.
Time to run the tests/benchmarks :)
Tru
--
Dr Tru Huynh | http://www.pasteur.fr/recherche/unites/Binfs/
mailto:tru.pasteur.fr | tel/fax +33 1 45 68 87 37/19
Institut Pasteur, 25-28 rue du Docteur Roux, 75724 Paris CEDEX 15 France
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to amber.scripps.edu
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo.scripps.edu
Received on Sun Mar 05 2006 - 06:10:16 PST
