Re: AMBER: Charges of enantiomers for Amber8

From: FyD <>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 08:53:43 +0100

Quoting lily ferreira <>:

> Fitting is not averaging! But at the end of the RESP
> calculations do we have to average the 10 charges?

Please, read the R.E.D.-II manual & tutorial, and you will get it...

In short, you can use one conf. to generate the charges for your molecule (1 set
of charge values) in a _single_ RESP run
N conf. to generate the charges for your molecule [1 (but different) set of
charge values] again in a _single_ RESP run.

The single set of charges has to "represent" the different conformations (and
orientations) of your structure...

> Because when we use LEaP,
> we have only to work with one set of charges for the enantiomers! So, how
> to procede after the calculation of the RESP charges of our 10
> conformations?

The set of charge values generated is generally independent of the mol.
orientation, mol. conformation and chirality (enantio. and even diastero.
althought more strange for me). LEaP recognizes a 'structure' based on
atom/residue names found in the OFF library and then just use the charges/FF
atom types corresponding to the atom names defined in this OFF file.

regards, Francois

The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to
Received on Fri Jan 27 2006 - 06:10:04 PST
Custom Search