RE: AMBER: Is the MD simulation normal

From: Bill Ross <>
Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 10:04:01 -0700 (PDT)

> You have an average Ca-RMSD below 1.0A! This is an indication of a
> reasonable trajectory.

I overlooked the magnitude - yes, rmsd < 1.0 is very stable.

Very good comments by Yong.

> At the ns time scale, it is indeed a good idea to do more simulations
> and to run the simulations much longer. This way you can see a clear
> trend. You need to make sure you change the initial random number seed
> and do so just once at the beginning.

Also make sure that the random number generator is used, by choosing
the right option for initial velocities.

The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to
Received on Sun May 29 2005 - 18:53:00 PDT
Custom Search