Sergio -
PMEMD benchmarks are out on the amber web site, amber.scripps.edu. If you
follow the pmemd link and look at the old release notes for pmemd 3.0 and
3.1, there are fairly complete benchmarks for pmemd 3.0/3.1, which are
maybe a little slower than pmemd 8. The only numbers I published for pmemd
8 is on the benchmarks page; I just copied it below. These two sources give
you some starting points; if you are not interested in using pmemd, you
should probably not run sander at really high processor count as it is not
very efficient. All my numbers were produced on PSC machines.
Regards - Bob Duke
BENCHMARKING RESULTS FOR PITTSBURGH SUPERCOMPUTER CENTER ALPHASERVER,
LEMIEUX
*******************************************************************************
LEMIEUX PERFORMANCE, Compaq 1 GHz ES45 alphaserver, Quadrics interconnect
*******************************************************************************
With the Quadrics interconnect, it is possible to use one or two
interconnect
"rails", with one rail being the default. Performance may be improved by
use
of two rails by on the order of 10-20%, but at the time of benchmarking,
there
appeared to be system problems associated with using two rails. Thus, at
present we only present data for one rail, and only recommend the use of one
rail. PMEMD optimization is the default optimization (no DIRFRC_*)
specified,
which produced the best results over a range of values.
90906 Atoms, Constant Pressure Molecular Dynamics (Factor IX)
#procs PMEMD Sander 8
psec/day psec/day
64 (4x16) 1745 500
128 (4x32) 2615 1172
Benchmarks were run on NCSA's Itanium 1 Linux cluster, which has a Myrinet
interconnect. The Itanium 1 is significantly slower than the Itanium 2, but
the benchmarks show good PMEMD scaling on the Myrinet interconnect out to
about 32 processors, which is fairly typical. The Itanium chips have a huge
L3 cache, so PMEMD is best optimized using DIRFRC_BIGCACHE_OPT (the
default).
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sergio E. Wong" <swon9.itsa.ucsf.edu>
To: <amber.scripps.edu>
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 5:08 PM
Subject: AMBER: amber 8 benchmarks dec alpha
> Dear sirs;
>
> I was wondering if anyone had any sort of amber 8 benchmark on dec
> alphas (compiled with the compaq f90 compiler). Thanks
>
> -Sergio
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> The AMBER Mail Reflector
> To post, send mail to amber.scripps.edu
> To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo.scripps.edu
>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to amber.scripps.edu
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo.scripps.edu
Received on Mon Jan 24 2005 - 22:53:00 PST
