Hi ,
The problem with Van der Walls energy is not between A and C , if the
angle is A-B-C.
the problem is bewteen to hydrogens that are in different parts of the
molecule. A,B and C are carbon, nitrogen and carbon respectively. I will
re-mention the problem trying to be more specific:
The model has 16 atoms. I have already done an ab initio energy plot for
different values of that angle. Then I calculate the non bonding energy
using Amber Force field, and obtain the potential difference curve(ab
initio - non bonded). When trying to adapt this curve with an harmonic
function, I realized that the difference curve has no minimum (itīs linear).
This has not happended when I parametrized other things. Personally I think
that the difference of Van der Walls energy between conformations that are
close to the equilibrium value is high respect to that one. For example
Units = Kcal
Angle 1_ ab initio 2_ non bonded(predominantly Van der
Walls) 2-1
110 16 397
381
125 0 (ref. points) 50
50
140 4 44
40
The problem is that "2-1" can not be adjusted with an harmonic potential.
Apologizing for non being expecific in the previous mail and/or this one.
Thanking in advance,
Gustavo
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to amber.scripps.edu
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo.scripps.edu
Received on Thu Aug 12 2004 - 22:53:00 PDT
