RE: AMBER: Xleap crash, problem with residue bonding

From: Bill Ross <>
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 14:55:58 -0700 (PDT)

> 1-4: angle 76 192 duplicates bond ('triangular' bond) or angle
> ('square' bond)
> ...
> So it seems that xleap thinks there are problems with certain angles
> duplicating bonds that form a triangle (I guess).

I think this means there are bonds forming triangles or squares.

1-4 interactions are treated seperately for nb calcs because it
is assumed that bond/angle/torsion terms cover those interactions.
As far as I remember, these cyclical structures are detected when
building excluded atom lists from bond and angle (and dihedral?)

The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to
Received on Thu Jul 22 2004 - 23:53:00 PDT
Custom Search