RE: AMBER: Xleap crash, problem with residue bonding

From: Bill Ross <ross.cgl.ucsf.edu>
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 14:55:58 -0700 (PDT)

> 1-4: angle 76 192 duplicates bond ('triangular' bond) or angle
> ('square' bond)
> ...
> So it seems that xleap thinks there are problems with certain angles
> duplicating bonds that form a triangle (I guess).

I think this means there are bonds forming triangles or squares.

1-4 interactions are treated seperately for nb calcs because it
is assumed that bond/angle/torsion terms cover those interactions.
As far as I remember, these cyclical structures are detected when
building excluded atom lists from bond and angle (and dihedral?)
lists.

Bill
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to amber.scripps.edu
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo.scripps.edu
Received on Thu Jul 22 2004 - 23:53:00 PDT
Custom Search