David A. Case wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2004, Ting Wang wrote:
>
>>I was trying to solvate my protein in xleap: solvateOct mol TIP3PBOX
>>12.0, I got more than 10K water molecules, the density > 3 g/cc, and the
>>protein is not fully covered by water. But when I used amber7:
>>solvateOct mol WATBOX216 12.0, I got 4391 wat and a density of 0.870
>>g/cc and the protein is fully covered by wat.
>
> There have been several reports of this sort of behavior
Yes. Recently, I encountered this problem as well. After having loaded a
parameter set explicitly (> source leaprc.ff94, os something like that),
everything went fine.
tomas
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to amber.scripps.edu
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo.scripps.edu
Received on Tue Jun 22 2004 - 08:53:00 PDT
