> > If you loaded a prep.in file for that residue and that file
> > has an IMPROPER section, this message probably means that
> > an improper in the prep.in was not matched by a parameter and
> > so no improper torsion was added to the prmtop.
>
> Bill may be correct here, but my reading of the code is that LEaP prints
> but otherwise ignores any "PREP-specified impropers".
That is exactly what I am trying to say. :-)
> I believe that this
> warning is coming from an improper that leap is trying to create by its
> algorithm for deciding where impropers might be needed (that is, around atoms
> bonded to exactly three other atoms).
Leap should silently ignore these UNLESS it has loaded a prep.in
for the residue that has an IMPROPER section, in which case it would
warn the user when the ff did not cover that explicit improper. I added
this feature for debugging when amber/leap switched from using
the IMPROPER section to assigning only ff-defined impropers.
It is too confusing to print a warning for every potential improper
that does not have a ff term.
Bill
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to amber.scripps.edu
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo.scripps.edu
Received on Mon Jun 21 2004 - 18:53:00 PDT
