Re: AMBER: Bad contacts

From: Carlos Simmerling <carlos.csb.sunysb.edu>
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 14:56:09 -0400

this doesn't make sense- you minimized the structure for 1000 steps
and the energy did not change?
carlos

>This structure is
> subjected to energy minimization for 1000 steps in Sander (Amber7), but
> no change is made in either energy level or structure geometry. These two
> residues still make 'aa clashing' in SwizzPDB Viewer.
>
>

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to amber.scripps.edu
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo.scripps.edu
Received on Wed Jun 09 2004 - 20:53:01 PDT
Custom Search