also try to do "make clean" and recompile.
maybe one of the binaries did not get recompiled
after you resized.
carlos
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lishan Yao" <yaolisha.mail.msu.edu>
To: <amber.scripps.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 2:20 PM
Subject: Re: AMBER: LES question
> Hi:
> When we installed it in RedHat 7 first time last year, we did the
> test. Everything was fine. Then when we installed it in Redhat 9, we
> didn't do the test. Just now, I tested LES. It works fine. I think maybe
> because I changed some limited sizes of variables. I can change them
> back and give another try.
>
> Best,
> Lishan
>
>
> On Wed, 2004-02-11 at 12:55, Carlos Simmerling wrote:
> > Lishan,
> >
> > I used standard amber7 compiled under Linux with g77
> > using your inputs (your crd, prmtop, etc) and it works
> > properly. Our output files match up until I get "Single
> > temperature bath for LES and non-LES" where you get
> > "LES particles coupled to a separate bath". My output
> > is the correct behavior, yours is not.
> >
> > I don't understand this. Did you run the sander tests after you
> > compiled the program?
> >
> > Carlos
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Lishan Yao" <yaolisha.mail.msu.edu>
> > To: <amber.scripps.edu>
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 4:02 PM
> > Subject: Re: AMBER: LES question
> >
> >
> > > Hi:
> > > Here are input files for two programs.
> > >
> > > Input file for addles.
> > >
> > > file rprm name=(ycd_1p60_new.prmtop) read
> > > file rcvb name=(md_npt1.restrt) read
> > > file wprm name=(ycd_1p60_les.prmtop) wovr
> > > file wcrd name=(ycd_1p60_les.inpcrd) wovr
> > > action
> > > omas
> > > spac numc=4 pick #mono 107 115 done
> > > spac numc=4 pick #mono 146 156 done
> > > spac numc=4 pick #mono 268 276 done
> > > spac numc=4 pick #mono 307 317 done
> > > *EOD
> > >
> > >
> > > Input file for sander.LES
> > >
> > > molecular dynamics run
> > > &cntrl
> > > imin=0,irest=1,ntx=5,tempi=100.0,
> > > ntt=1,temp0=300.0,tautp=0.5,
> > > ntp=0,
> > > ntb=1,ntc=2,ntf=2,
> > > nstlim=250000,dt=0.002,
> > > ntwe=1000,ntwx=1000,ntpr=100,
> > > &end
> > >
> > >
> > > Lishan
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Tue, 2004-02-10 at 16:01, Vlad Cojocaru wrote:
> > > > Well, to me it seems that you are coupling the LES region to another
> > > > bath. My LES protocols run properly now but I am using the same
> > > > temperature for both LES non-LES. I guess it would be useful if you
give
> > > > an input file both from your addles and from your dynamics so people
can
> > > > judge what's up
> > > > vlad
> > > >
> > > > Lishan Yao wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >Hi:
> > > > > I posted this problem about two weeks ago. And I really
appreciate
> > > > >all the responses, which helped me solve several problems. But
> > > > >sander.LES still can't be run correctly.
> > > > > Here is the output I got from sander.LES. 1). The number of
water
> > > > >molecule is wrong. It should be about 15000. 2). The total charge
is a
> > > > >little bit larger than what it should be. I think something is
wrong
> > > > >with topology file. But I exactly follow the manual. And there is
no
> > > > >complaint when I run addles.What could be wrong?
> > > > >
> > > > >Thanks in advance.
> > > > >
> > > > >Best,
> > > > >Lishan
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Number of triangulated 3-point waters found: 7767
> > > > >| Atom division among processors:
> > > > >| 0 28277 56555
> > > > >| Running AMBER/MPI version on 2 nodes
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Sum of charges from parm topology file = 0.00018743
> > > > > Forcing neutrality...
> > > > >
> > > >
> >
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > -----
> > > > > 4. RESULTS
> > > >
> >
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > -----
> > > > >
> > > > ># degrees of freedom in non-LES region: 116597.
> > > > ># degrees of freedom in LES region: 0.
> > > > > LES particles coupled to separate bath
> > > > > LES target temperature: 0.00
> > > > > LES target kinetic energy: 0.00
> > > > >non-LES target temperature: 300.00
> > > > >non-LES target kinetic energy: 34754.19
> > > > > ---------------------------------------------------
> > > > > APPROXIMATING switch and d/dx switch using CUBIC SPLINE
INTERPOLATION
> > > > > using 5000.0 points per unit in tabled values
> > > > > TESTING RELATIVE ERROR over r ranging from 0.0 to cutoff
> > > > >| CHECK switch(x): max rel err = 0.3242E-14 at 2.436720
> > > > >| CHECK d/dx switch(x): max rel err = 0.8156E-11 at 2.782960
> > > > > ---------------------------------------------------
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > >The AMBER Mail Reflector
> > > > >To post, send mail to amber.scripps.edu
> > > > >To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo.scripps.edu
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> >
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > The AMBER Mail Reflector
> > > To post, send mail to amber.scripps.edu
> > > To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo.scripps.edu
> > >
> >
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > The AMBER Mail Reflector
> > To post, send mail to amber.scripps.edu
> > To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo.scripps.edu
> >
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> The AMBER Mail Reflector
> To post, send mail to amber.scripps.edu
> To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo.scripps.edu
>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to amber.scripps.edu
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo.scripps.edu
Received on Wed Feb 11 2004 - 19:53:00 PST
