Re: AMBER: surface code in Amber

From: David A. Case <case.scripps.edu>
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2003 22:45:18 -0800

On Sun, Oct 26, 2003, John Lee wrote:
>
> Thanks for the reply. I got the paper about LCPO and the code
> (gbsa.h) in AMBER. I found, in fact, it calculats all the atoms
> accessible area to get the solvent-accessible area by (do i=1,natom...).
> Here natom is the atom number in the whole protein. But what if there
> is a cave inside of the protein and the space is big enough to
> contains the probe ball. While there is no water can come into that
> cave actually. Thus the solvent-accessible area will be wrong. I am
> not sure about the interpretation. Am I right? or there are some other
> code that only calculate those atoms close to the surface in gbsa.h
> and I didn't catch it?

As with many surface area algorithms, the LCPO model does not distiguish
between "interior" and "exterior" solvent accessibility. (That is, you
have read the code correctly.)

...dac

-- 
==================================================================
David A. Case                     |  e-mail:      case.scripps.edu
Dept. of Molecular Biology, TPC15 |  fax:          +1-858-784-8896
The Scripps Research Institute    |  phone:        +1-858-784-9768
10550 N. Torrey Pines Rd.         |  home page:                   
La Jolla CA 92037  USA            |    http://www.scripps.edu/case
==================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to amber.scripps.edu
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo.scripps.edu
Received on Mon Oct 27 2003 - 07:53:03 PST
Custom Search