Re: AMBER: a question

From: David A. Case <case.scripps.edu>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 15:36:08 -0700

On Fri, Oct 17, 2003, Pingna Xu wrote:
>
> I have checked the website and found the sentence "Add the
> following note: in Amber 6, igb=3 was used to specify a distance-dependent
> dielectric; in Amber 7, this can be accomplished by setting eedmeth=5 in the
> &ewald namelist (see p. 100)." But I think my case is not an ewald one.So
> this sentence is not applicable to my case,right?I am not sure...
>

No,this is what you use, even thought you are not using Ewald. Set ntb=0
(no periodicity) and eedmeth=5 and you will get a distance-dependent
dielectric. Note that the manual does say (on p. 100) "[eedmeth=5] is
indended for non-periodic calculations, where no reciprocal term is computed".

...good luck..dac

-- 
==================================================================
David A. Case                     |  e-mail:      case.scripps.edu
Dept. of Molecular Biology, TPC15 |  fax:          +1-858-784-8896
The Scripps Research Institute    |  phone:        +1-858-784-9768
10550 N. Torrey Pines Rd.         |  home page:                   
La Jolla CA 92037  USA            |    http://www.scripps.edu/case
==================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to amber.scripps.edu
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo.scripps.edu
Received on Fri Oct 17 2003 - 23:53:00 PDT
Custom Search