Hi Dave,
I want to use Spartan instead of Gaussian and asked the mailing list
about it. However, I did not get any response. Seems to be something
like a grey zone. I think people just got used to using Gaussian and
RESP. If you find out something, please let me know, though...
Good luck,
Peter
David E. Konerding DSD Staff wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am interested in using NWCHEM, rather than MOPAC or GAUSSIAN, to do
> atom point charge derivations for a small molecule.
> From what I can tell in the NWCHEM manual, it may be possible to avoid
> running AMBER RESP or ANTECHAMBER and use NWCHEM
> directly:
>
> (from "Capabilities":
> "Electrostatic potential fit of atomic partial charges (CHELPG method
> with optional RESP restraints or charge constraints)")
>
> I wanted to check with the list to see if anybody has done this
> (there's nothing in the mailing list history that suggests anybody has)
> and whether the process was relatively successful.
>
> Dave
>
>
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> The AMBER Mail Reflector
> To post, send mail to amber.scripps.edu
> To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo.scripps.edu
>
>
>
> .
>
--
**************************************************
Peter Oelschlaeger, Ph.D.
Mayo lab, Division of Biology, Caltech
1200 E. California Blvd., mail code 114-96
Pasadena, CA 91125-9600
Phone: (626) 395-8085, Lab: (626) 395-6407
Fax: (626) 440-7231
Email: poe.caltech.edu
http://www.mayo.caltech.edu
**************************************************
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to amber.scripps.edu
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo.scripps.edu
Received on Sat Sep 06 2003 - 05:53:01 PDT
