RE: Valdiation of Latest Amber parameters

From: Sia Meshkat <sMeshkat.proteinMechanics.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2003 15:19:04 -0700

David and Jim,

Thanks. I am now using the ff94 charges.

However, the problem of two (reasonably different) conformations
minimizing into one, is still there.
 
Regards,

Sia Meshkat

-----Original Message-----
From: David A. Case [mailto:case.scripps.edu]
Sent: Monday, July 07, 2003 3:04 PM
To: Sia Meshkat
Cc: amber.heimdal.compchem.ucsf.edu
Subject: Re: Valdiation of Latest Amber parameters

On Mon, Jul 07, 2003, Sia Meshkat wrote:
>
> Actually, I am trying to run without polarization with parm99.dat, but
> the only charge data I can find for amino acids is in
"all_amino02.in".
>
> Where can I get "all_amino99.in", etc.?

There is no such beast. Charge distributions for non-polarizable force
fields are the same as in ff94.

Please see the files in $AMBERHOME/dat/leap/cmd, or pp. 17-19 of the
Users' Manual.

...dac

-- 
==================================================================
David A. Case                     |  e-mail:      case.scripps.edu
Dept. of Molecular Biology, TPC15 |  fax:          +1-858-784-8896
The Scripps Research Institute    |  phone:        +1-858-784-9768
10550 N. Torrey Pines Rd.         |  home page:                   
La Jolla CA 92037  USA            |    http://www.scripps.edu/case
==================================================================
Received on Mon Jul 07 2003 - 23:53:01 PDT
Custom Search