force field name

From: A. Hungie <>
Date: Thu 15 Aug 2002 20:50:48 +0700

Dear All,

I used force field "parm94.dat" for my MD simulations. As I have seen in
several papers, some authers cited to "Cornell et al. force field", while
some authers cited to "amber95 force field". I am a litle bit confuse that
why not "amber94 force field" because of parm94.dat. I would like to refer
force field name in my thesis. What name is correct? or can I use "amber95
force field of Cornell et al."?

Thank you very much in advance.


Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger:
Received on Thu Aug 15 2002 - 06:50:48 PDT
Custom Search