> Hi all,
> just a simplistic answer about GB and PB. PB is more rigorous so gives
more
> accurate results and takes more time to compute.
>
> Hope this helps.
>
> Martin.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> ----
> Martin Lepsik, PhD student Phone: +420/2/20183-540, Fax:
> +420/2/20183-292
> Dept. of Theor Chem & Center for Complex molecular Systems and
Biomolecules
> Institute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry (IOCB)
> Flemingovo nam 2,
> Czech Academy of Sciences,
> 166 10, Prague 6,
> Czech Rep.
> URL: www.uochb.cas.cz/~teochem
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "X. Tan" <xjtan_at_u.washington.edu>
> To: <amber_at_heimdal.compchem.ucsf.edu>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 1:04 AM
> Subject: mm_pbsa
>
>
> >
> > Hi, It was my first attempt to use MM_PBSA. In MM_PBSA script, I
> > used GB program for solvation energy calculation, and my system includes
> > 207 res and about 300 wat(solvatecap). The belows is the result of
> > MM_PBSA.
> >
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----
> > Complex (AB) Receptor (A) Ligand (B)
> >
Contribution ----------------------- ------------------------------------
> > mean std mean std mean std
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Eele -7125.1719 19.5950 -7131.1970 19.4149 55.4103 1.7476
> > EvdW 709.6931 209.5975 725.9703 209.2015 6.5952 1.4115
> > Einter 2433.0899 20.8501 2403.6254 20.2172 29.4646 3.9879
> > Egas -3982.4187 209.1412 -4001.6013 208.8900 91.4594 4.0415
> > E(nonp) 54.3154 0.1371 54.7697 0.1353 3.5090 0.0209
> > E(nonpGB) 70.9311 0.1821 71.5346 0.1797 3.4393
0.0278
> > E(GB) -1207.5667 16.0135 -1217.2146 15.9862 -22.1748
1.0877
> > E(sol) -1136.6355 15.9617 -1145.6799 15.9395 -18.7356
1.0818
> > E(GB+ele) -8332.7386 15.7243 -8348.4115 15.1948 33.2354 1.1136
> > E(tot,GB) -5119.0542 209.0189 -5147.2812 208.7454 72.7239 3.6919
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Interactions [AB-(A+B)]
> > ------------------------------------
> > Contribution mean std
> > ------------------------------------
> > Eelectrostat -49.3852 4.5673
> > EvdW -22.8723 4.2184
> > Egas -72.2768 3.8228
> > E(nonpolar) -3.9633 0.0399
> > E(nonpolGB) -4.0428 0.0530
> > E(GB) 31.8228 2.5724
> > E(solvation) 27.7800 2.5821
> > E(GB+elect) -17.5625 3.3003
> > E(total,GB) -44.4969 2.8664
> > -----------------------------------
> >
> > Though there are a couple of emails on the list talking about meaning of
> > each items, I am still not clear what is the exact meaning for
> > the terms Egas and Einternal, and where them come from.
> >
> > Secondly, it looks weird that the std values of Evdw and Egas for
complex
> > and receptor are much larger than the others. Is there something wrong
> with my
> > computation?
> >
> > The last question is which program, delphi or GB generally gives better
> > solvation energy?
> >
> > Can anyone help me with those? Thanks a lots.
> >
> > Xiaojian Tan
> >
>
Received on Fri May 24 2002 - 07:27:21 PDT