Re: [AMBER] MMPBSA.py results unresponsive to changes in epsin

From: David A Case via AMBER <amber.ambermd.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2025 08:31:33 -0600

On Tue, Jul 22, 2025, Johann, Timothy via AMBER wrote:
>
>Looking at ipb, it’s a &pb namelist variable, and I’m running &gb only.
>I haven’t been running with MMPBSA because of the much longer compute
>time.

My understanding is that generalized Born was parameterized for use with an
internal dielectric of 1. There is not an option to use a different epsin.

[Negin can correct me here, but I believe that the same think applies to the
r6 variant of GB as well.]

....good luck...dac


_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Thu Jul 24 2025 - 08:00:03 PDT
Custom Search