[AMBER] Positive value of MM-GBSA computations

From: Maciej Spiegel via AMBER <amber.ambermd.org>
Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2024 19:26:29 +0200

Dear Amber Users,

I am currently working on a protein anchored in a membrane bilayer. After equilibrating the system for 100 ns, I docked the potential ligand using AutoDock Vina and ran another 100 ns of simulations. The ligand consistently occupied the binding site. Subsequently, I performed MM-GBSA calculations and obtained a small but positive value for the interaction energy:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Differences (Complex - Receptor - Ligand):
Energy Component Average Std. Dev. Std. Err. of Mean
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
VDWAALS -11.9224 2.2582 0.0226
EEL -60.8192 15.3864 0.1539
EGB 75.4142 12.6881 0.1269
ESURF -2.6166 0.1865 0.0019

DELTA G gas -72.7415 14.6457 0.1465
DELTA G solv 72.7976 12.6124 0.1261

DELTA TOTAL 0.0561 3.1697 0.0317
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

For your reference, the input used is as follows:

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
&general
 strip_mask = :WAT:K+:Cl-:PA:PE:OL:PC",
/
&gb
saltcon=0.150,
/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I generated topologies using the command:

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ante-MMPBSA.py -p MD.prmtop -c COMPLEX.prmtop -r RECEPTOR.prmtop -l LIGAND.prmtop -s :WAT:K+:Cl-:PA:PE:OL:PC -n :FST
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Given the small positive interaction energy, I am wondering what could be the reason for this result. How should I interpret this value in the context of the expected binding affinity toward the pocket where the ligand was docked? Would doing MM-PBSA be a „solution” for the issue?

Thank you for your insights.

Maciej Spiegel, MPharm PhD
assistant professor
.GitHub <https://farmaceut.github.io/>

Department of Organic Chemistry and Pharmaceutical Technology,
Faculty of Pharmacy, Wroclaw Medical University
Borowska 211A, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland

_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Sun Sep 08 2024 - 10:30:02 PDT
Custom Search