Re: [AMBER] MMPBSA-Nonpolar-solvation-energy-parameters:

From: Ray Luo via AMBER <amber.ambermd.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2023 10:54:01 -0700

To reproduce the inp=1 result in the paper, please follow the suggested
parameters while setting inp=1 in amber22/amber23.

In addition to cavity_offset and cavity_surften, make sure you're using the
same radius definition as mentioned in the paper. Set radiopt=0 so the
radii are read from the prmtop file as you specified in tleap. Set
istrng in M for ionic strength and also dielectric constants (exdi, indi)
for water and solute.

I suppose you are not working on a membrane protein ... Otherwise, there
are additional settings.

You can read the chapter on PBSA for more details on the PB keywords.

All the best,
Ray
--
Ray Luo, Ph.D.
Professor of Structural Biology/Biochemistry/Biophysics,
Chemical and Materials Physics, Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering,
Biomedical Engineering, and Materials Science and Engineering
Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry
University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-3900
On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 10:15 AM Kankana Bhattacharjee <
kankana.bhattacharjee_phd21.ashoka.edu.in> wrote:
> Ok. overall change in binding free energy is matching close with paper
> when SASA parameters are taking from the amber22 default values. But,
> energetic contributions is not matching well. Like, nonpolar solvation free
> energy change for my calculation is -31.3532 kcal/mol, whereas the value is
> -3.67 kcal/mol, DelE_electrostatics for my calculation is  -1.4430
> kcal/mol, whereas the paper is having -26.99 kcal/mol.
>
> So, in amber22 version, I have to only include "inp=2" and SASA parameters
> would be taking from the amber22 default values ?
>
>
>
> [image: Mailtrack]
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=signaturevirality11&__;!!CzAuKJ42GuquVTTmVmPViYEvSg!Il4MNEjlvM46MO3TltglVvwcaIsbz_aSutKfjJ8FJLIVwBUgPP3XftzwhxUtTZ0U6o96xMptBfz6pBZKmlrgBl20DbPj$> Sender
> notified by
> Mailtrack
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=signaturevirality11&__;!!CzAuKJ42GuquVTTmVmPViYEvSg!Il4MNEjlvM46MO3TltglVvwcaIsbz_aSutKfjJ8FJLIVwBUgPP3XftzwhxUtTZ0U6o96xMptBfz6pBZKmlrgBl20DbPj$> 08/28/23,
> 10:00:13 PM
>
> On Mon, Aug 28, 2023, 21:17 Ray Luo <rluo.uci.edu> wrote:
>
>> The default inp was changed from 1 to 2 by developers. So you are
>> using two different nonpolar solvent models between amber12 and
>> amber22, leading to your observation. This has been raised many times
>> in the past.
>>
>> Please read the following paper to gain some background information on
>> nonpolar solvation modeling:
>>
>> Tan et al, Implicit Nonpolar Solvent Models,
>> https://doi.org/10.1021/jp073399n
>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://doi.org/10.1021/jp073399n__;!!CzAuKJ42GuquVTTmVmPViYEvSg!Il4MNEjlvM46MO3TltglVvwcaIsbz_aSutKfjJ8FJLIVwBUgPP3XftzwhxUtTZ0U6o96xMptBfz6pBZKmlrgBi1QWRzn$>
>>
>> All the best,
>> Ray
>> --
>> Ray Luo, Ph.D.
>> Professor of Structural Biology/Biochemistry/Biophysics,
>> Chemical and Materials Physics, Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering,
>> Biomedical Engineering, and Materials Science and Engineering
>> Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry
>> University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-3900
>>
>> --
>> Ray Luo, Ph.D.
>> Professor of Structural Biology/Biochemistry/Biophysics,
>> Chemical and Materials Physics, Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering,
>> Biomedical Engineering, and Materials Science and Engineering
>> Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry
>> University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-3900
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 5:09 AM Kankana Bhattacharjee
>> <kankana.bhattacharjee_phd21.ashoka.edu.in> wrote:
>> >
>> > Ok. When I explicitly mentioned the cavity surften, cavity offset
>> values based on the paper (amber 12 version) in my input file (amber 22
>> version), then non-polar solvation free energy change is decreasing and
>> matching with the paper. But, total bonding free energy change is zero. How
>> is it possible ?
>> > While I took the default SASA parameters according to amber22 version,
>> then total binding free energy change is matching close. Is it because of
>> SASA parameters in different amber versions (amber 12, amber 22) ya "inp"
>> model ?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Sender notified by
>> > Mailtrack 08/28/23, 05:36:07 PM
>> >
>> > On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 10:43 AM Ray Luo <rluo.uci.edu> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> No. It's the nonpolar solvent model option.
>> >>
>> >> Ray
>> >>
>> >> On Sun, Aug 27, 2023, 20:25 Kankana Bhattacharjee <
>> kankana.bhattacharjee_phd21.ashoka.edu.in> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Are you talking about internal dielectric constant?
>> >>>
>> >>> On Mon, Aug 28, 2023, 04:43 Ray Luo <rluo.uci.edu> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> The final output shows that you are using the default inp=2 option.
>> Please set inp=1 in your pb section if you want to seek agreement with the
>> tutorial setting.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> All the best,
>> >>>> Ray
>> >>>> --
>> >>>> Ray Luo, Ph.D.
>> >>>> Professor of Structural Biology/Biochemistry/Biophysics,
>> >>>> Chemical and Materials Physics, Chemical and Biomolecular
>> Engineering,
>> >>>> Biomedical Engineering, and Materials Science and Engineering
>> >>>> Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry
>> >>>> University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-3900
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Sun, Aug 27, 2023 at 12:15 PM Kankana Bhattacharjee <
>> kankana.bhattacharjee_phd21.ashoka.edu.in> wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Hello,
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> I am sharing the "mmpbsa.in
>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://mmpbsa.in__;!!CzAuKJ42GuquVTTmVmPViYEvSg!Il4MNEjlvM46MO3TltglVvwcaIsbz_aSutKfjJ8FJLIVwBUgPP3XftzwhxUtTZ0U6o96xMptBfz6pBZKmlrgBj8lgiEY$>"
>> and "Final-mmpbsa.dat", "energy.dat" files herewith.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Thanks & Regards
>> >>>>> Kankana Bhattacharjee
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
>> >>>>> From: Ray Luo <rluo.uci.edu>
>> >>>>> Date: Sun, Aug 27, 2023 at 11:13 AM
>> >>>>> Subject: Re: [AMBER] MMPBSA-Nonpolar-solvation-energy-parameters:
>> >>>>> To: Kankana Bhattacharjee <
>> kankana.bhattacharjee_phd21.ashoka.edu.in>, AMBER Mailing List <
>> amber.ambermd.org>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Dear Bhattacharjee,
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Can you share your "mmpbsa.in
>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://mmpbsa.in__;!!CzAuKJ42GuquVTTmVmPViYEvSg!Il4MNEjlvM46MO3TltglVvwcaIsbz_aSutKfjJ8FJLIVwBUgPP3XftzwhxUtTZ0U6o96xMptBfz6pBZKmlrgBj8lgiEY$>"
>> and also the result output files?
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> All the best,
>> >>>>> Ray
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> All the best,
>> >>>>> Ray
>> >>>>> --
>> >>>>> Ray Luo, Ph.D.
>> >>>>> Professor of Structural Biology/Biochemistry/Biophysics,
>> >>>>> Chemical and Materials Physics, Chemical and Biomolecular
>> Engineering,
>> >>>>> Biomedical Engineering, and Materials Science and Engineering
>> >>>>> Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry
>> >>>>> University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-3900
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 12:48 PM Kankana Bhattacharjee via AMBER
>> >>>>> <amber.ambermd.org> wrote:
>> >>>>> >
>> >>>>> > Dear AMBER users,
>> >>>>> >
>> >>>>> > I am trying to reproduce the change in enthalpy of binding of
>> >>>>> > protein-ligand complex using MMPBSA . In the paper,  Authors'
>> used  amber12
>> >>>>> > version  and cavity_surften, cavity_offset were set as  0.005420,
>> -1.008
>> >>>>> > respectively.
>> >>>>> > Whereas, I am using amber22 version, in this case, default values
>> of
>> >>>>> > cavity_surften, cavity_offset are 0.0378, -0.5692 respectively.
>> When my
>> >>>>> > calculations were done using the default (cavity_surften,
>> cavity_offset
>> >>>>> > parameters), the result matched closely enough with the paper.
>> But,
>> >>>>> > when I explicitly
>> >>>>> > mentioned the  cavity_surften, and cavity_offset parameters
>> (based on the
>> >>>>> > paper) in "mmpbsa.in
>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://mmpbsa.in__;!!CzAuKJ42GuquVTTmVmPViYEvSg!Il4MNEjlvM46MO3TltglVvwcaIsbz_aSutKfjJ8FJLIVwBUgPP3XftzwhxUtTZ0U6o96xMptBfz6pBZKmlrgBj8lgiEY$>"
>> file,  I am getting positive enthalpy change of
>> >>>>> > binding !! Could you kindly give suggestions regarding this?
>> >>>>> >
>> >>>>> > Your suggestions would be highly appreciated.
>> >>>>> >
>> >>>>> > Thanks and regards
>> >>>>> > Kankana Bhattacharjee
>> >>>>> > _______________________________________________
>> >>>>> > AMBER mailing list
>> >>>>> > AMBER.ambermd.org
>> >>>>> >
>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber__;!!CzAuKJ42GuquVTTmVmPViYEvSg!IMjwHDD5PnwYkCEQW4JOWYqk2BejQdfFCDjMXNKyFtUx5-tN9M6tTMrsJT5DAwvbum7Ea8WHqvM$
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Sender notified by
>> >>>>> Mailtrack 08/28/23, 12:43:33 AM
>>
>
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Mon Aug 28 2023 - 11:00:02 PDT
Custom Search