Re: [AMBER] clustering trajectories based on RMSD cut-off

From: Carlos Simmerling via AMBER <amber.ambermd.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2022 06:37:09 -0400

You may want to try hieragglo, it works the way you describe.

On Mon, Oct 17, 2022, 4:50 AM Sorin Draga via AMBER <amber.ambermd.org>
wrote:

> Hello everyone,
>
> I would like to cluster a trajectory output strictly based on a RMSD
> cutoff, without defining the number of output clusters (in other words, I
> would like the clustering algorithm to output whatever number of clusters
> it sees fit) and later adjust this based on the above rmsd cutoff.
> I have looked at the clustering tutorials and manual but I cannot find a
> suitable solution to this.
>
> Would *dme [<mask] *coupled with* [nofit] * be a solution in this case?
>
> Thank you and please excuse my ignorance on the matter.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Sorin
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Mon Oct 17 2022 - 04:00:02 PDT
Custom Search