[AMBER] Antechamber vs R.E.D. Server

From: Sam Walsworth (Researcher) <"Sam>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2020 19:30:54 +0000

Hi all

I'm going to use Antechamber (w/ GAMESS-US) to generate ESP charges and fit them via RESP. I was considering if using R.E.D. Server is a better alternative to GAMESS-US/Antechamber? I will be using organometallic ligands going forward and read that software for generating organometallic parameters such as VFFDT are fully compatible with antechamber, hence why I've committed to the GAMESS-US/Antechamber method thus far.

Thanks in advance
University of Huddersfield inspiring global professionals.

This transmission is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you receive it in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and remove it from your system. If the content of this e-mail does not relate to the business of the University of Huddersfield, then we do not endorse it and will accept no liability.
AMBER mailing list
Received on Wed Dec 16 2020 - 12:00:02 PST
Custom Search