[AMBER] Antechamber vs R.E.D. Server

From: Sam Walsworth (Researcher) <"Sam>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2020 19:30:54 +0000

Hi all

I'm going to use Antechamber (w/ GAMESS-US) to generate ESP charges and fit them via RESP. I was considering if using R.E.D. Server is a better alternative to GAMESS-US/Antechamber? I will be using organometallic ligands going forward and read that software for generating organometallic parameters such as VFFDT are fully compatible with antechamber, hence why I've committed to the GAMESS-US/Antechamber method thus far.

Thanks in advance
Sam
University of Huddersfield inspiring global professionals.
[http://marketing.hud.ac.uk/_HOSTED/EmailSig2014/EmailSigFooterMarch2019.jpg]

This transmission is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you receive it in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and remove it from your system. If the content of this e-mail does not relate to the business of the University of Huddersfield, then we do not endorse it and will accept no liability.
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Wed Dec 16 2020 - 12:00:02 PST
Custom Search