I'd find a copy of the source and compile it. Probably sander/cpu
wouldn't be a lot of work to do. A binary from then might expect old
libs to be in place.
Bill
On 12/15/20 2:37 PM, Kenneth Huang wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> A very strange question- does anyone happen to have, or know anyone who has
> the old binaries for Amber 4 gathering dust on a hard disk?
>
> I'm having something of a debate about whether the minimization procedure
> in what was shipped in Amber 4 (assuming done in sander?) would be
> comperable to minimization in contemporary Amber (specifically sander in
> Amber 16,18, 20) builds given the same setup, parameters, etc. Given sander
> is one of the older parts of Amber, my thought is that it shouldn't have
> changed much?
>
> Barring the unlikely chance anyone has still code that old around still,
> would there be any good way to test to see if the minization changed in a
> signficant way? My first thought was to find a minimized test structure in
> the source code that might date back from that time, but I haven't had much
> luck in sifting through the test folder so far.
>
> Best,
>
> Kenneth
>
--
Phobrain.com
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Tue Dec 15 2020 - 20:30:02 PST
