Re: [AMBER] Problem in Leap PDB Reading

From: Bill Ross <ross.cgl.ucsf.edu>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 21:53:37 -0700

Every residue needs its own unique number might fix it.. also TER between molecules. Also you could try w/out OMC for debug, and see if 'long bond' is the only problem.BillAI:http://phobrain.com/pr/home/view.html
-------- Original message --------From: Robert Molt <rwmolt07.gmail.com> Date: 10/23/19 7:13 PM (GMT-08:00) To: amber.ambermd.org Subject: [AMBER] Problem in Leap PDB Reading General problem: leap “incorrectly” reads in my PDB file. I say “incorrectly” because I am sure the fault is actually mine.System under consideration: I have a system with both a protein and a DNA helix. I have amino acids numbered 43-318; I then have nucleic acids numbered 1-21, twice (once for each strand). I have attached the relevant PDB file in this email. In particular, the amino acids are numbered 43-318 in the file, and then the nucleic acids are numbered 1-21 for the first strand, then 1-21 again for the second strand.Commands issued: xleapsource leaprc.ff14SBpiggy=loadpdb 2.pdbSymptoms of the problem:leap responded with> piggy=loadpdb 2.pdbLoading PDB file: ./2.pdbEnter zPdbReadScan from call depth  0.-- residue 328: duplicate [ C1'] atoms (total 2)-- residue 328: duplicate [ C2] atoms (total 2)-- residue 328: duplicate [ C2'] atoms (total 2)-- residue 328: duplicate [ C3'] atoms (total 2)-- residue 328: duplicate [ C4] atoms (total 2)-- residue 328: duplicate [ C4'] atoms (total 2)-- residue 328: duplicate [ C5] atoms (total 2)-- residue 328: duplicate [ C5'] atoms (total 2)-- residue 328: duplicate [ C6] atoms (total 2)-- residue 328: duplicate [ CM2] atoms (total 2)-- residue 328: duplicate [ N1] atoms (total 2)-- residue 328: duplicate [ N3] atoms (total 2)-- residue 328: duplicate [ N4] atoms (total 2)-- residue 328: duplicate [ O2] atoms (total 2)-- residue 328: duplicate [ O2'] atoms (total 2)-- residue 328: duplicate [ O3'] atoms (total 2)-- residue 328: duplicate [ O4'] atoms (total 2)-- residue 328: duplicate [ O5'] atoms (total 2)-- residue 328: duplicate [ OP1] atoms (total 2)-- residue 328: duplicate [ OP2] atoms (total 2)-- residue 328: duplicate [ P] atoms (total 2)-- residue 329: duplicate [ C1] atoms (total 2)-- residue 329: duplicate [ C2] atoms (total 2)-- residue 329: duplicate [ C3] atoms (total 2)-- residue 329: duplicate [ C4] atoms (total 2)-- residue 329: duplicate [ C5] atoms (total 2)-- residue 329: duplicate [ O3] atoms (total 2)-- residue 329: duplicate [ O4] atoms (total 2)-- residue 329: duplicate [ O5] atoms (total 2)-- residue 329: duplicate [ OP2] atoms (total 2)…etc., until,-- residue 156: duplicate [ NH1] atoms (total 2)-- residue 156: duplicate [ NH2] atoms (total 2)   Warning: Atom names in each residue should be unique.     (Same-name atoms are handled by using the first      occurrence and by ignoring the rest.      Frequently duplicate atom names stem from alternate      conformations in the PDB file.)Exit  zPdbReadScan from call depth  0.Matching PDB residue names to LEaP variables.Mapped residue ALA, term: Terminal/beginning, seq. number: 0 to: NALA.(Residue 1: LEU, Nonterminal, was not found in name map.)(Residue 2: TYR, Nonterminal, was not found in name map.)(Residue 3: GLU, Nonterminal, was not found in name map.)As far as I can tell, I do not have duplicate atoms. Suffice it to say that it is all downhill from here on out in loading the file.Specific questions:1.) Should numbering in a pdb file for leap be consecutive? i.e., 43-360, in my case?2.) I assume to ignore the “was not found in name map,” based on other Amberposts which recount this as a “trivial” error that is inconsequential 3.) Eventually, I get a leap dialogue ofJoining DG - DCJoining DC - DGCreating new UNIT for residue: OMC sequence: 328One sided connection. Residue:  missing connect0 atom.Created a new atom named: N1 within residue: .R<OMC 328>Created a new atom named: C2 within residue: .R<OMC 328>Created a new atom named: N3 within residue: .R<OMC 328>The first two lines show it is joining various DNA nucleic acids as “connected.” The next few lines alarm me: this should be the end of making connections? I gather my PDB is missing a TER flag?_______________________________________________AMBER mailing listAMBER.ambermd.orghttp://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Wed Oct 23 2019 - 22:00:02 PDT
Custom Search