Re: [AMBER] the unperturbed charge of the unit is not zero

From: Charu Sharma (JRF) <"Charu>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2018 21:56:11 +0530

Respected sir,
I am getting hurdle in this why it is not loading the molecule?

On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 9:22 PM David A Case <david.case.rutgers.edu> wrote:

> On Tue, Oct 30, 2018, soukaina louerdi wrote:
>
> > Please you will find attached files of 3 Molecules
>
> OK...some progress.
>
> First, antechamber is apparently ignoring the "-m" flag. (CC-ing to
> Scott for investigation.) So, you are indeed getting a closed shell ion
> calculation.
>
> Second, you asked for a net charge of +1 ("-nc 1") which corresponds to
> removing a hydride from the parent molecule. The charges one gets
> indeed sum to +1. It's unclear what you did later on to get a charge
> inside tleap of -1, but that may be uninportant: you can always look in
> the mol2 file for the actual charges being used.
>
> Third, neither +1 or -1 is likely to be correct for a polymerization
> modeling: I'm guessing that two neutral radicals coming together is more
> likely to be what you want. So you may just want to get charges for the
> parent molecule, remove the appropriate hydrogens (which will have small
> net charges) and manually redistribute the excess charge over the
> molecule, so that each unit has zero charge.
>
> ...hope this helps...dac
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>


_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber


Screenshot_from_2018-10-30_21-52-10.png
(image/png attachment: Screenshot_from_2018-10-30_21-52-10.png)

Screenshot_from_2018-10-30_21-52-10.png
(image/png attachment: 02-Screenshot_from_2018-10-30_21-52-10.png)

Received on Tue Oct 30 2018 - 09:30:03 PDT
Custom Search