[AMBER] Amber targeted MD tgtmdfrc

From: 李耀 <liyao17.mails.tsinghua.edu.cn>
Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2018 00:59:25 +0800 (GMT+08:00)

Dear Amber users,


I'm running targeted MD using Amber18 and this is my input file:



targeted MD tgtfitmask
&cntrl
  imin = 0, ntx = 5, nstlim = 700000, irest = 1,
  dt = 0.002, ntc = 2, ntf = 2,
  temp0 = 300.0,
  cut = 8.0,
  ntpr = 2000, ntwx = 5000, ntwr = 10000,
  ntb = 2, ntt = 3, ntp = 1,
  igb = 0, nmropt = 1, gamma_ln = 2.0,
  tgtfitmask = ":490,870,47,669,769,567,869,872,892,891,495,894,409,665,900,798,388,871,61,489,630,893,791,631,795,881,778,576,883,793,788,799,584,336,758,797,182,767,581,26,158,796,347,656,677,695,681,660,675,694,8,190,671,794,252,354,10.CA",
  itgtmd = 1, tgtmdfrc = 20.0,
  tgtrmsmask = ":940-967.P",
/
&wt
  TYPE = 'TGTRMSD', istep1 = 1, istep2 = 500000,
  value1 = 3.0, value2 = 0.0,
/
&wt
  TYPE = 'TGTRMSD', istep1 = 500001, istep2 = 700000,
  value1 = 0.0, value2 = 0.0,
/
&wt
  type = "END",
/
       

I changed the 'tgtmdfrc' in the input file, and when tgtmdfrc=100 there came the error "coordinate resetting (SHAKE) cannot be accomplished, deviation is too large". If I reduce the value of tgtmdfrc, there won't be this error but targeted MD will not work, either.

Are there probably some deeper problems with the minimization or heating process of the system? Or I just need to adjust the atommask and tgtmdfrc value?


Thank you!


Best,
Yao Li
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Sat Jul 28 2018 - 10:00:03 PDT
Custom Search