Re: [AMBER] Amber targeted MD restraintmask

From: Carlos Simmerling <carlos.simmerling.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2018 08:00:20 -0400

Are you sure you're using ntr and not itgtmd? The latter is the targeted md
option. Ntr=1 is for Cartesian positional restraints and no fitting is
involved.

On Thu, Jul 19, 2018, 10:57 PM 李耀 <liyao17.mails.tsinghua.edu.cn> wrote:

> Hello Amber,
>
>
> I'm using "ntr=1, restraintmask=" to run targeted MD. In the tutorial it's
> wrote that "the molecule is ’fitted’ implicitly by applying positional
> restraints to atoms specified in restraintmask". I wander in Amber if the
> these atoms (in restraintmask) of the initial structure is aligned to the
> corresponding atoms in the reference structure before running targeted MD?
> This is important for me. Thank you!
>
>
> Best,
> Yao Li
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Fri Jul 20 2018 - 05:30:02 PDT
Custom Search