Re: [AMBER] Problem with g++ compiler with boost (AmberTools18)

From: David A Case <>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2018 07:21:47 -0400

On Wed, May 30, 2018, Matias Machado wrote:

> I'm not a c++ expert but according to StackOverflow the order of
> arguments given to g++ do matters:

Thanks for the note. We have discovered this ourselves, and just have
been delaying posting a bugfix, trying to sort out some other issues at
the same time. I'll try to get an update posted as soon as I can.


AMBER mailing list
Received on Thu May 31 2018 - 04:30:02 PDT
Custom Search