Re: [AMBER] ntxo option in amber

From: Bill Ross <ross.cgl.ucsf.edu>
Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2017 02:48:00 -0800

Why not use the latest?

If the options aren't in the doc, which seems odd, you can always look
at docs of later versions, or read the code to figure them out.

Bill


On 11/11/17 2:45 AM, Leena Aggarwal wrote:
> Yes, I am using Amber12.
>
> On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 4:09 PM, Bill Ross <ross.cgl.ucsf.edu> wrote:
>
>> Should you even be using Amber 12? I would use the latest, and check the
>> manual for that.
>>
>> Bill
>>
>>
>> On 11/11/17 2:36 AM, Leena Aggarwal wrote:
>>> Dear Amber users
>>> In Amber 12 reference manual, ntxo=0 and 1 are specified but the
>> simulation
>>> is running even with ntxo=2,3 and even with 4.
>>> It is specified in amber archives that ntxo=2 and ioutfm=1 are preferred
>>> for very long simulation runs over iwrap=1.
>>> What does ntxo=3 and ntxo=4 stand for??
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> AMBER mailing list
>>> AMBER.ambermd.org
>>> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> AMBER mailing list
>> AMBER.ambermd.org
>> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber


_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Sat Nov 11 2017 - 03:00:03 PST
Custom Search