Re: [AMBER] For restraint heating

From: Saikat Pal <saikatpaliitg.yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2017 14:29:41 +0000 (UTC)

Thank you Sir for your kind response. I have one more Doubt : In case of minimization we are using sander .Is it possible to use pmemd for minimization ??.If it is possible which is the best sander or pmemd ??Thanks And regards ,
Saikat



On Tuesday 29 August 2017, 7:43:43 PM IST, Bill Ross <ross.cgl.ucsf.edu> wrote:

Either way looks good if they are equivalent atomically, but I think
10.0 or less might be more common. In any case, it is worth plunging
ahead and trying e.g. 1,10,100 and watch the movie to see how much the
DNA moves in each case.

Bill


On 8/29/17 7:06 AM, Saikat Pal wrote:
> Dear all,
> For restraint heating If I use :
> Hold the DNA fixed
> 100.0
> ATOM 1 715
> END
> END
>
> In case of:Hold the DNA fixed100.0
> RES 1 22
> END
> END
>
> Is it correct ??Please help me out .
> Saikat
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber


_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Tue Aug 29 2017 - 07:30:05 PDT
Custom Search