[AMBER] string methods in AMBER16

From: Chunli Yan <utchunliyan.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2017 15:00:33 -0400

Hello,

I want to test string methods using pmemd.cuda.

Below is the steps how I compile amber16 with AmberTools16,

1. export AMBERHOME=`pwd`
2. ./update_amber --update (I can not pass update.4 and update.9 that
relate to string methods)
3. ./update_amber --apply patch=../../nfe_advance.patch/nfe_advance.patch
4. ./configure -cuda intel
5. make install


But I always have problems to pass update.4 and update.9, it complains
below:


Applying AmberTools 16/update.9.gz

/home/cyan/program/amber16/updateutils/patch.py:334: PatchingWarning:
Permissions not found for every file in
.patches/AmberTools16_Unapplied_Patches/update.9.
All new files will be read-only!

  'files will be read-only!') % self.name, PatchingWarning)

Applying Amber 16/update.4.gz

/home/cyan/program/amber16/updateutils/patch.py:334: PatchingWarning:
Permissions not found for every file in
.patches/Amber16_Unapplied_Patches/update.4.
All new files will be read-only!

  'files will be read-only!') % self.name, PatchingWarning)


Once I finish the installing and ran string methods with pmemd.duda. I got
the following error:


forrtl: severe (71): integer divide by zero

Image PC Routine Line Source

libintlc.so.5 00002B862BA802C9 Unknown Unknown Unknown

libintlc.so.5 00002B862BA7EB9E Unknown Unknown Unknown

libifcore.so.5 00002B862A72908F Unknown Unknown Unknown

libifcore.so.5 00002B862A690D7F Unknown Unknown Unknown

libifcore.so.5 00002B862A6A2309 Unknown Unknown Unknown

libpthread.so.0 000000397460F7E0 Unknown Unknown Unknown

pmemd.cuda 000000000071B524 Unknown Unknown Unknown

pmemd.cuda 00000000006C4EF6 Unknown Unknown Unknown

pmemd.cuda 00000000004E5CD6 Unknown Unknown Unknown

pmemd.cuda 0000000000409F66 Unknown Unknown Unknown

libc.so.6 0000003973E1ED1D Unknown Unknown Unknown

pmemd.cuda 0000000000409DE1 Unknown Unknown Unknown

[comet-34-06.sdsc.edu:mpispawn_0][child_handler] MPI process (rank: 0, pid:
186206) exited with status 71


Does anyone know what is wrong in it?


Thanks,


Best,


*Chunli*
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Tue Aug 01 2017 - 12:30:02 PDT
Custom Search