Hi Bill
Thanks for the reply.
As I said before, I am also running it without the restraint, and it shows to be going well. But my question is why it is giving the warning due apparently to imposing the restraint? There should not be anything wrong with applying that restraint. Although it is not an error but a warning, why is that so?
I just wondered to understand what the warning says.
The reason that I am trying to impose the restraint is that I would want to keep the length of the molecule the same; in other words, to keep the two atoms in their positions. I should be able to do so.
Ramin
________________________________
From: Bill Ross <ross.cgl.ucsf.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2017 8:20:07 PM
To: amber.ambermd.org
Subject: Re: [AMBER] Warning during minimization
What if you try without restraints? If that works, then worry about the
restraints.
Also, you could search the code for 'No offset found for match' to get
clues.
Bill
On 6/14/17 6:14 PM, Ramin Salimi wrote:
> Dear All
>
> I am doing my second step of minimization to minimize the whole system but to keep two end atoms fixed. However, I get the following WARNING, but the minimization is still going on, and is printing the output file:
>
> WARNING **: No offset found for match "n" at page 421 after processing 1 results
>
> This is my input file to minimize the whole system:
> Minimize solute and solvent
> &cntrl
> imin=1, ntmin=1, nmropt=1,
> maxcyc=10000, ncyc=5000,
> ntb=1, ntp=0, cut=10.0, nsnb=20,
> ntc=1, ntf=1, ntx=1, irest=0,
> ntpr=100, ntwr=100,
> ioutfm=1, ibelly=0, ntr=0,
> iwrap=0, igb=0,
>
> &end
> &wt type='DUMPFREQ', istep1=10 /
> &wt type='END' /
> DISANG=dist_nmropt.RST
> DUMPAVE=dist_vs_nmroptchange
> LISTIN=POUT
> LISTOUT=POUT
> /
> where dist_nmropt.RST is:
>
> &rst
> iat=2,382,
> r1=0,
> r2=44.9179,
> r3=44.9179,
> r4=9999,
> rk2=50.0,
> rk3=50.0,
>
> &end
>
> I got the value of r2=r3=44.9179 by measuring the distance from the output coordinate file of the first minimization step with CPPTRAJ. I feel it has something to do with using the restraint since with switching off the nmropt option, it has not printed that warning so far. But why does it show the warning with nmropt=1? is it important?
>
> I would appreciate any help.
>
> Regards
>
> Ramin
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flists.ambermd.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Famber&data=02%7C01%7Cramin.salimi01%40utrgv.edu%7Cc5417ad39cd7489a830908d4b38cae98%7C990436a687df491c91249afa91f88827%7C0%7C0%7C636330864178742665&sdata=qcaDGxWVbxeQcMsa1tBoc5Ww269fuFCdNZvkMIJVx1Y%3D&reserved=0
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flists.ambermd.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Famber&data=02%7C01%7Cramin.salimi01%40utrgv.edu%7Cc5417ad39cd7489a830908d4b38cae98%7C990436a687df491c91249afa91f88827%7C0%7C0%7C636330864178742665&sdata=qcaDGxWVbxeQcMsa1tBoc5Ww269fuFCdNZvkMIJVx1Y%3D&reserved=0
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Wed Jun 14 2017 - 18:30:04 PDT
