Re: [AMBER] residue-based dielectric model in MMGBSA
This message
: [
Message body
] [ More options (
top
,
bottom
) ]
Related messages
: [
Next message
] [
Previous message
] [
In reply to
] [
Next in thread
] [
Replies
]
Contemporary messages sorted
: [
by date
] [
by thread
] [
by subject
] [
by author
] [
by messages with attachments
]
From
: Thomas Cheatham <
tec3.utah.edu
>
Date
: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 19:32:27 -0600 (MDT)
> A quick Google search suggests this:
>
>
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3351111/
>
> ...dac
Obviously DAC is a more seasoned explorer, but my biases still stand :-)
--tec3
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on
Fri Apr 21 2017 - 19:00:02 PDT
This message
: [
Message body
]
Next message
:
David Case: "Re: [AMBER] AmberTools17: test of mpi configuration with pnetcdf failed on Mac OS X 10.10"
Previous message
:
Thomas Cheatham: "Re: [AMBER] residue-based dielectric model in MMGBSA"
In reply to
:
David Case: "Re: [AMBER] residue-based dielectric model in MMGBSA"
Next in thread
:
David Case: "Re: [AMBER] residue-based dielectric model in MMGBSA"
Reply
:
David Case: "Re: [AMBER] residue-based dielectric model in MMGBSA"
Reply
:
Jaime Rubio Martinez: "Re: [AMBER] residue-based dielectric model in MMGBSA"
Contemporary messages sorted
: [
by date
] [
by thread
] [
by subject
] [
by author
] [
by messages with attachments
]
Custom Search