Re: [AMBER] dUMP parameters

From: Mrinal Arandhara <arandharamrinal.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2017 10:53:42 -0500

I derived charges by using gaussian (esp) . I have also tried the AM1-BCC
charges.

On Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 10:37 AM, Elvis Martis <elvis.martis.bcp.edu.in>
wrote:

> Sorry,
> I meant How did you derive the partial charges?
>
> Best Regards
>
>
>
> Elvis Martis
> Ph.D. Student (Computational Chemistry)
> at Bombay College of Pharmacy
>
>
> A Kalina, Santacruz [E], Mumbai 400098, INDIA
> W www.elvismartis.in
> Skype. adrian_elvis12
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mrinal Arandhara [mailto:arandharamrinal.gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, March 05, 2017 8:51 PM
> To: amber.ambermd.org
> Subject: [AMBER] dUMP parameters
>
> I'm trying to run a MD simulation of protien-ligand complex with
> dUMP(monoanionic) as cofactor. The gaff parameters for dUMP generated by
> parmchk has reasonable penalty values but after minimisation step two
> atoms(one O and the other hydroxyl-H) attached to the P-atom are sitting
> on top of each other and 1-4 EEL value is very large (*************) .Is
> it due to wrong force field parameters or wrong charges ??Are the
> parameters for dUMP available ??
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Sun Mar 05 2017 - 08:00:03 PST
Custom Search