Re: [AMBER] REMD_just_1.10ns/day

From: Hai Nguyen <nhai.qn.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 14:01:44 -0500

yes, implicit solvent in this case is Generalized Born model. It does not
scale very well with the number of atoms.
So getting that slow speed is expected. The strength of GB model is to make
conformation searching much more
efficient than explicit water simulation.

btw, your system is very big and very challenging for REMD (you can do
literature search).

For your input: You should exclude "rgbmax=15.0" and let AMBER to use the
default value.

Hai

On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 1:53 PM, Thakur, Abhishek <axt651.miami.edu> wrote:

> Hi every one,
>
> I am running REMD on 128 processors with 10706 atoms implicitly and just
> getting 1.1ns/day.
>
> Is it normal that such calculation run so slow?
>
> Or can there be a possibility of some fault in my script?
>
> Here is what I am using
>
>
> &cntrl
> irest=1, ntx=5,
> nstlim=100, dt=0.004,
> ntt=3, gamma_ln=50.0,
> temp0=XXXXX, ig=RANDOM_NUMBER,
> ntc=2, ntf=2, nscm=1000,
> ntb=0, igb=5,
> cut=999.0, rgbmax=15.0,
> ntpr=100, ntwx=1000, ntwr=100000,
> nmropt=1,
> numexchg=100000,
> saltcon=0.2,
> /
> &wt TYPE='END'
> /
> DISANG=WT_chir.dat
>
>
> Thanking you,
>
> -AT
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Tue Jan 24 2017 - 11:30:02 PST
Custom Search