Re: [AMBER] amber14 parallel build problems

From: Ada Sedova <ada.a.sedova.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2017 10:22:41 -0500

*Just tried rebuilding serial and then parallel in the same folder, one
after the other, as instructed.*

**The yacc/cifparse error is still crashing the build:**

*stdout:*

make[2]: Entering directory
`/autofs/nccs-svm1_home2/adaa/AMBER/amber14/AmberTools/src/cifparse'

/ccs/home/adaa/AMBER/amber14/bin/yacc -v -d cifparse.y

make[2]: *** [cifp.tab.c] Error 1

make[1]: *** [parallel] Error 2

make: *** [install] Error 2

make[2]: Leaving directory
`/autofs/nccs-svm1_home2/adaa/AMBER/amber14/AmberTools/src/cifparse'

make[1]: Leaving directory
`/autofs/nccs-svm1_home2/adaa/AMBER/amber14/AmberTools/src'


*stderr:*

yacc:22340 terminated with signal 11 at PC=40abac SP=7ffce7b14400.
Backtrace:

/ccs/home/adaa/AMBER/amber14/bin/yacc[0x40abac]

/ccs/home/adaa/AMBER/amber14/bin/yacc[0x40ce6b]

/ccs/home/adaa/AMBER/amber14/bin/yacc[0x404dfd]

/lib64/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xfd)[0x7f773ecc1d1d]

/ccs/home/adaa/AMBER/amber14/bin/yacc[0x400ea9]

make[2]: *** [cifp.tab.c] Error 1

make[1]: *** [parallel] Error 2

make: *** [install] Error 2


*compilers:*

PE-gnu/4.8.2-1.8.4

openmpi/1.8.4


*output from ./config:*

Obtaining the gnu suite version:

      gcc -v

The version is 4.8.2


Testing the gcc compiler:

     gcc -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -o testp testp.c

OK


Testing the g++ compiler:

     g++ -o testp testp.cpp

OK


Testing the gfortran compiler:

     gfortran -O0 -o testp testp.f

OK


Testing mixed C/Fortran compilation:

     gcc -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -c -o testp.c.o
testp.c

     gfortran -O0 -c -o testp.f.o testp.f

     gcc -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -o testp testp.c.o
testp.f.o -lgfortran -w

OK


Testing pointer size:

     gcc -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -o test_pointer_size
test_pointer_size.c

Detected 64 bit operating system.


Testing flex: OK


Checking NetCDF...

Using bundled NetCDF library.

Using existing NetCDF in '/ccs/home/adaa/AMBER/amber14'

Checking NetCDF...

Using bundled NetCDF library.

Using existing NetCDF in '/ccs/home/adaa/AMBER/amber14'


Checking for zlib: OK


Checking for libbz2: OK


Configuring fftw-3.3 for mdgx (may be time-consuming)...


    fftw-3.3 configure succeeded.

testing [C++ / fortran] cross-compile with MPI libs

The configuration file, config.h, was successfully created.



*mpicc and mpif90:*

-bash-4.1$ mpicc -show

gcc -I/sw/rhea/openmpi/1.8.4/rhel6.6_gcc4.8.2/include -pthread -L/usr/lib64
-Wl,-rpath -Wl,/usr/lib64 -Wl,-rpath
-Wl,/sw/rhea/openmpi/1.8.4/rhel6.6_gcc4.8.2/lib -Wl,--enable-new-dtags
-L/sw/rhea/openmpi/1.8.4/rhel6.6_gcc4.8.2/lib -lmpi

-bash-4.1$ mpif90 -show

gfortran -I/sw/rhea/openmpi/1.8.4/rhel6.6_gcc4.8.2/include -pthread
-I/sw/rhea/openmpi/1.8.4/rhel6.6_gcc4.8.2/lib -L/usr/lib64 -Wl,-rpath
-Wl,/usr/lib64 -Wl,-rpath -Wl,/sw/rhea/openmpi/1.8.4/rhel6.6_gcc4.8.2/lib
-Wl,--enable-new-dtags -L/sw/rhea/openmpi/1.8.4/rhel6.6_gcc4.8.2/lib
-lmpi_usempi -lmpi_mpifh -lmpi


*redhat version:*

-bash-4.1$ cat /etc/redhat-release

Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.8 (Santiago)

On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 9:22 AM, Ada Sedova <ada.a.sedova.gmail.com> wrote:

> Great, thanks. I'm going to see what it's going to take to get OLCF a site
> license upgrade to 16 next week.
>
> What about #1? Should I track this down and change all to MAP_LABEL?
>
> On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 12:07 AM, Hai Nguyen <nhai.qn.gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> per 2-4: it's ok to ignore. The GB energies are fine, but the reported
>> parameters in mdout are not correct (updated in amber16).
>> (likely related to: http://archive.ambermd.org/201602/0190.html)
>>
>> Hai
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 11:22 PM, Ada Sedova <ada.a.sedova.gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > THANK YOU!
>> >
>> > *As for the tests, they did all pass in terms of errors, but there were
>> > four diffs in Amber:*
>> >
>> > make[2]: Leaving directory `/autofs/nccs-svm1_home2/adaa/
>> > AMBER/amber14/test'
>> >
>> > 148 file comparisons passed
>> >
>> > 4 file comparisons failed
>> >
>> > 0 tests experienced errors
>> >
>> > 1)
>> > This one looks like a typo unless you really have two different
>> variables
>> > one named MAPLABLE and one named MAPLABEL
>> >
>> > * MAPLABLE = EMAP
>> >
>> > *
>> >
>> > *> MAPLABEL = EMAP *
>> >
>> >
>> > The others I am unsure:
>> >
>> > 2-4)
>> >
>> > possible FAILURE: check mdout.trxox.dif
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > /ccs/home/adaa/AMBER/amber14/test/gb8_trx
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > 46a47,51
>> >
>> > *> gb_alpha_hnu = 0.53705, gb_beta_hnu = 0.36286,
>> > gb_gamma_hnu = 0.11670
>> > *
>> >
>> > *> gb_alpha_cnu = 0.33167, gb_beta_cnu = 0.19684,
>> > gb_gamma_cnu = 0.09342
>> > *
>> >
>> > *> gb_alpha_nnu = 0.68631, gb_beta_nnu = 0.46319,
>> > gb_gamma_nnu = 0.13872
>> > *
>> >
>> > *> gb_alpha_onu = 0.60634, gb_beta_onu = 0.46301,
>> > gb_gamma_onu = 0.14226
>> > *
>> >
>> > *> gb_alpha_pnu = 0.41836, gb_beta_pnu = 0.29005,
>> > gb_gamma_pnu = 0.10642
>> > *
>> >
>> > *---------------------------------------
>> >
>> > *
>> >
>> > possible FAILURE: check mdout.trxox_md.dif
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > /ccs/home/adaa/AMBER/amber14/test/gb8_trx
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > 48a49,53
>> >
>> > *> gb_alpha_hnu = 0.53705, gb_beta_hnu = 0.36286,
>> > gb_gamma_hnu = 0.11670
>> > *
>> >
>> > *> gb_alpha_cnu = 0.33167, gb_beta_cnu = 0.19684,
>> > gb_gamma_cnu = 0.09342
>> > *
>> >
>> > *> gb_alpha_nnu = 0.68631, gb_beta_nnu = 0.46319,
>> > gb_gamma_nnu = 0.13872
>> > *
>> >
>> > *> gb_alpha_onu = 0.60634, gb_beta_onu = 0.46301,
>> > gb_gamma_onu = 0.14226
>> > *
>> >
>> > *> gb_alpha_pnu = 0.41836, gb_beta_pnu = 0.29005,
>> > gb_gamma_pnu = 0.10642
>> > *
>> >
>> > *---------------------------------------
>> >
>> > *
>> >
>> > possible FAILURE: check mdout.trxox_md.dif
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > /ccs/home/adaa/AMBER/amber14/test/gb8_trx
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > 48a49,53
>> >
>> > *> gb_alpha_hnu = 0.53705, gb_beta_hnu = 0.36286,
>> > gb_gamma_hnu = 0.11670
>> > *
>> >
>> > *> gb_alpha_cnu = 0.33167, gb_beta_cnu = 0.19684,
>> > gb_gamma_cnu = 0.09342
>> > *
>> >
>> > *> gb_alpha_nnu = 0.68631, gb_beta_nnu = 0.46319,
>> > gb_gamma_nnu = 0.13872
>> > *
>> >
>> > *> gb_alpha_onu = 0.60634, gb_beta_onu = 0.46301,
>> > gb_gamma_onu = 0.14226
>> > *
>> >
>> > *> gb_alpha_pnu = 0.41836, gb_beta_pnu = 0.29005,
>> > gb_gamma_pnu = 0.10642 *
>> >
>> >
>> > *For AmberTools there are no diff files generated.*
>> >
>> > I have only the logfile and here is tail:
>> >
>> > make[2]: Leaving directory `/autofs/nccs-svm1_home2/adaa/
>> > AMBER/amber14/test'
>> >
>> > make[2]: Entering directory
>> > `/autofs/nccs-svm1_home2/adaa/AMBER/amber14/AmberTools/test'
>> >
>> >
>> > Finished test suite for AmberTools at Fri Jan 13 00:56:46 EST 2017.
>> >
>> >
>> > make[2]: Leaving directory
>> > `/autofs/nccs-svm1_home2/adaa/AMBER/amber14/AmberTools/test'
>> >
>> > 1271 file comparisons passed
>> >
>> > 0 file comparisons failed
>> >
>> > 0 tests experienced errors
>> >
>> > Test log file saved as
>> > /ccs/home/adaa/AMBER/amber14/logs/test_at_serial/2017-01-12_
>> 23-29-48.log
>> >
>> > No test diffs to save!
>> >
>> >
>> > Should these be a problem?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 3:34 PM, Hai Nguyen <nhai.qn.gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 3:29 PM, Ada Sedova <ada.a.sedova.gmail.com>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > So are you saying that the parallel build uses files created in the
>> > > serial
>> > > > build?
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Yes. I think the manual should use "MUST" :D.
>> > >
>> > > This issue happened several times in amber mail list, so I think we
>> > should
>> > > probably add some checking
>> > > to make sure user do the serial build first.
>> > >
>> > > http://dev-archive.ambermd.org/201612/0000.html
>> > >
>> > > Hai
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > > It was ambiguous in the tutorial why they want you to do the serial
>> > > > build first. I assumed it was just so you know what errors happen in
>> > each
>> > > > version.
>> > > >
>> > > > On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 3:26 PM, Hai Nguyen <nhai.qn.gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > You told "I have the serial build in a completely different
>> folder"
>> > > > >
>> > > > > What do you mean here?
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Hai
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 3:25 PM, Ada Sedova <
>> ada.a.sedova.gmail.com>
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > I already did the serial build first, as in my previous email.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 3:23 PM, Hai Nguyen <nhai.qn.gmail.com>
>> > > wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Hi
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > I have the serial build in a completely different folder,
>> and I
>> > > ran
>> > > > > the
>> > > > > > > parallel build complete anew, from a different login, even.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Try to do the serial build first, then parallel build. Both
>> > should
>> > > > > happen
>> > > > > > > in the same folder.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > *> page 23 of amber16 manual says: *
>> > > > > > > *> "Do not choose any parallel options at this step! You will
>> > need
>> > > to
>> > > > > > > install *
>> > > > > > > *> the serial version first; options for parallel builds are
>> > > > described
>> > > > > > > below *
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > *> at Step 8. " *
>> > > > > > > Hai
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 3:12 PM, Ada Sedova <
>> > > ada.a.sedova.gmail.com>
>> > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Thanks Scott,
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > To answer a few of your questions:
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > No, ORNL does not have a supported amber installation. We
>> have
>> > a
>> > > > site
>> > > > > > > > license for amber14 only, which is why no upgrade. If we
>> want
>> > to
>> > > > use
>> > > > > it
>> > > > > > > we
>> > > > > > > > have to download it ourselves and build.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Yes, I am very familiar with the compiling procedure at ORNL
>> > and
>> > > I
>> > > > > have
>> > > > > > > > submitted a help ticket, but currently no one with a good
>> > amount
>> > > of
>> > > > > > > > compiling experience here can figure out how to deal with
>> this
>> > > > > problem.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > I have the serial build in a completely different folder,
>> and I
>> > > ran
>> > > > > the
>> > > > > > > > parallel build complete anew, from a different login, even.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Yes, I do need parallel executable, as the reason we are
>> trying
>> > > to
>> > > > > use
>> > > > > > > > amber is for the DFT-MD for a larger small system.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > I will check the serial tests. That is strange.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Thanks again,
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Ada
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 2:35 PM, Scott Brozell <
>> > > > > > sbrozell.rci.rutgers.edu
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > Hi,
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > The most likely possibilities are probably:
>> > > > > > > > > 1. broken parallel tools;
>> > > > > > > > > 2. conflicting serial and parallel tools;
>> > > > > > > > > 3. residual conflicting amber files between the serial and
>> > > > parallel
>> > > > > > > > builds.
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > The apparent first error:
>> > > > > > > > > > /usr/bin/ld: reader.o(.text+0x5a): unresolvable
>> > R_X86_64_PC32
>> > > > > > > > relocation
>> > > > > > > > > might be fixed with compiling options like -fpic.
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > But my advice is to take a step back and tackle these
>> bigger
>> > > > > picture
>> > > > > > > > items:
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > Doesn't ORNL have supported amber installations ?
>> > > > > > > > > Did you read the ORNL documentation on installing
>> software,
>> > > etc ?
>> > > > > > > > > Did you ask them for help ?
>> > > > > > > > > Do you need parallel amber executables ?
>> > > > > > > > > When will you upgrade to amber 16 ?
>> > > > > > > > > Double check your serial tests - i haven't seen all
>> passing
>> > > tests
>> > > > > in
>> > > > > > > > > amber for at least a decade.
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > If you still need help from us after investigating those
>> then
>> > > > send
>> > > > > > > > > verbose and verbatim details: compiler names, versions,
>> > -show
>> > > > > > output,
>> > > > > > > > > your config.h s, the redhat-release, the complete build
>> logs,
>> > > > etc.
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > scott
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 12:52:40PM -0500, Ada Sedova
>> wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > > I am trying to build amber14/amberTools on RHEA, an OLCF
>> > > (ORNL)
>> > > > > > > > commodity
>> > > > > > > > > > cluster, with dual Intel® Xeon® E5-2650 CPUs, which uses
>> > > > modules.
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > The build was successful on the same system in serial,
>> and
>> > > all
>> > > > > > tests
>> > > > > > > > > passed
>> > > > > > > > > > after building.
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > However, when trying to build with mpi, I am exiting the
>> > make
>> > > > > > install
>> > > > > > > > > from
>> > > > > > > > > > the following folder:
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > make[2]: Entering directory
>> > > > > > > > > > `/autofs/nccs-svm1_home2/adaa/
>> > AMBER/amber14/AmberTools/src/
>> > > > > > cifparse'
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > flex -t cifparse.l | sed 's/yy/cifp/g' > lex.cif.c
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > /ccs/home/adaa/AMBER/amber14/bin/yacc -v -d cifparse.y
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > make[2]: Leaving directory
>> > > > > > > > > > `/autofs/nccs-svm1_home2/adaa/
>> > AMBER/amber14/AmberTools/src/
>> > > > > > cifparse'
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > make[1]: Leaving directory
>> > > > > > > > > > `/autofs/nccs-svm1_home2/adaa/
>> > AMBER/amber14/AmberTools/src'
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > with the following error:
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > main.o: In function `create_file_names':
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > main.c:(.text+0x607): warning: the use of `mktemp' is
>> > > > dangerous,
>> > > > > > > better
>> > > > > > > > > use
>> > > > > > > > > > `mkstemp'
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > /usr/bin/ld: reader.o(.text+0x5a): unresolvable
>> > R_X86_64_PC32
>> > > > > > > > relocation
>> > > > > > > > > > against symbol `cache'
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > /usr/bin/ld: reader.o(.text+0x6c): unresolvable
>> > R_X86_64_PC32
>> > > > > > > > relocation
>> > > > > > > > > > against symbol `cache'
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > /usr/bin/ld: reader.o(.text+0x73): unresolvable
>> > R_X86_64_PC32
>> > > > > > > > relocation
>> > > > > > > > > > against symbol `cache'
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > /usr/bin/ld: reader.o(.text+0x84): unresolvable
>> > R_X86_64_PC32
>> > > > > > > > relocation
>> > > > > > > > > > against symbol `cache'
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > /usr/bin/ld: reader.o(.text+0x5b1): unresolvable
>> > > R_X86_64_PC32
>> > > > > > > > relocation
>> > > > > > > > > > against symbol `cache'
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > /usr/bin/ld: reader.o(.text+0x5c9): unresolvable
>> > > R_X86_64_PC32
>> > > > > > > > relocation
>> > > > > > > > > > against symbol `cache'
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > /usr/bin/ld: reader.o(.text+0x5eb): unresolvable
>> > > R_X86_64_PC32
>> > > > > > > > relocation
>> > > > > > > > > > against symbol `cache'
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > /usr/bin/ld: reader.o(.text+0x60d): unresolvable
>> > > R_X86_64_PC32
>> > > > > > > > relocation
>> > > > > > > > > > against symbol `cache'
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > /usr/bin/ld: reader.o(.text+0x62f): unresolvable
>> > > R_X86_64_PC32
>> > > > > > > > relocation
>> > > > > > > > > > against symbol `cache'
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > /usr/bin/ld: reader.o(.text+0x651): unresolvable
>> > > R_X86_64_PC32
>> > > > > > > > relocation
>> > > > > > > > > > against symbol `cache'
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > /usr/bin/ld: reader.o(.text+0x669): unresolvable
>> > > R_X86_64_PC32
>> > > > > > > > relocation
>> > > > > > > > > > against symbol `cache'
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > /usr/bin/ld: reader.o(.text+0x68b): unresolvable
>> > > R_X86_64_PC32
>> > > > > > > > relocation
>> > > > > > > > > > against symbol `cache'
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > /usr/bin/ld: reader.o(.text+0x6ad): unresolvable
>> > > R_X86_64_PC32
>> > > > > > > > relocation
>> > > > > > > > > > against symbol `cache'
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > /usr/bin/ld: reader.o(.text+0x6cf): unresolvable
>> > > R_X86_64_PC32
>> > > > > > > > relocation
>> > > > > > > > > > against symbol `cache'
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > /usr/bin/ld: reader.o(.text+0x1590): unresolvable
>> > > R_X86_64_PC32
>> > > > > > > > > relocation
>> > > > > > > > > > against symbol `cache'
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > /usr/bin/ld: reader.o(.text+0x15f7): unresolvable
>> > > R_X86_64_PC32
>> > > > > > > > > relocation
>> > > > > > > > > > against symbol `cache'
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > /usr/bin/ld: reader.o(.text+0x1785): unresolvable
>> > > R_X86_64_PC32
>> > > > > > > > > relocation
>> > > > > > > > > > against symbol `cache'
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > /usr/bin/ld: reader.o(.text+0x194f): unresolvable
>> > > R_X86_64_PC32
>> > > > > > > > > relocation
>> > > > > > > > > > against symbol `cache'
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > /usr/bin/ld: reader.o(.text+0x1967): unresolvable
>> > > R_X86_64_PC32
>> > > > > > > > > relocation
>> > > > > > > > > > against symbol `cache'
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > /usr/bin/ld: reader.o(.text+0x1976): unresolvable
>> > > R_X86_64_PC32
>> > > > > > > > > relocation
>> > > > > > > > > > against symbol `cache'
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > /usr/bin/ld: reader.o(.text+0x1b70): unresolvable
>> > > R_X86_64_PC32
>> > > > > > > > > relocation
>> > > > > > > > > > against symbol `cache'
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > /usr/bin/ld: reader.o(.text+0x1c41): unresolvable
>> > > R_X86_64_PC32
>> > > > > > > > > relocation
>> > > > > > > > > > against symbol `cache'
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > /usr/bin/ld: reader.o(.text+0x1ffb): unresolvable
>> > > R_X86_64_PC32
>> > > > > > > > > relocation
>> > > > > > > > > > against symbol `cache'
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > /usr/bin/ld: reader.o(.text+0x2002): unresolvable
>> > > R_X86_64_PC32
>> > > > > > > > > relocation
>> > > > > > > > > > against symbol `cache'
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > /usr/bin/ld: reader.o(.text+0x2659): unresolvable
>> > > R_X86_64_PC32
>> > > > > > > > > relocation
>> > > > > > > > > > against symbol `cache'
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > /usr/bin/ld: reader.o(.text+0x2693): unresolvable
>> > > R_X86_64_PC32
>> > > > > > > > > relocation
>> > > > > > > > > > against symbol `cache'
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > /usr/bin/ld: reader.o(.text+0x26ac): unresolvable
>> > > R_X86_64_PC32
>> > > > > > > > > relocation
>> > > > > > > > > > against symbol `cache'
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > yacc:3249 terminated with signal 11 at PC=40abac
>> > > > SP=7fff87123600.
>> > > > > > > > > > Backtrace:
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > /ccs/home/adaa/AMBER/amber14/bin/yacc[0x40abac]
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > /ccs/home/adaa/AMBER/amber14/bin/yacc[0x40ce6b]
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > /ccs/home/adaa/AMBER/amber14/bin/yacc[0x404dfd]
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > /lib64/libc.so.6(__libc_start_
>> main+0xfd)[0x7eff172bed1d]
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > /ccs/home/adaa/AMBER/amber14/bin/yacc[0x400ea9]
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > make[2]: *** [cifp.tab.c] Error 1
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > make[1]: *** [parallel] Error 2
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > make: *** [install] Error 2
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________
>> > > > > > > > > AMBER mailing list
>> > > > > > > > > AMBER.ambermd.org
>> > > > > > > > > http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > _______________________________________________
>> > > > > > > > AMBER mailing list
>> > > > > > > > AMBER.ambermd.org
>> > > > > > > > http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > _______________________________________________
>> > > > > > > AMBER mailing list
>> > > > > > > AMBER.ambermd.org
>> > > > > > > http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > _______________________________________________
>> > > > > > AMBER mailing list
>> > > > > > AMBER.ambermd.org
>> > > > > > http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > _______________________________________________
>> > > > > AMBER mailing list
>> > > > > AMBER.ambermd.org
>> > > > > http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>> > > > >
>> > > > _______________________________________________
>> > > > AMBER mailing list
>> > > > AMBER.ambermd.org
>> > > > http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>> > > >
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > AMBER mailing list
>> > > AMBER.ambermd.org
>> > > http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>> > >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > AMBER mailing list
>> > AMBER.ambermd.org
>> > http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> AMBER mailing list
>> AMBER.ambermd.org
>> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Sat Jan 14 2017 - 07:30:02 PST
Custom Search