Re: [AMBER] potential energy

From: Albert <mailmd2011.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 12:16:48 +0100

It is a cyclic peptide. One is in R conformation, the other one is in S
conformation.

I want to figure out which conformation is more favourable from the
aspect of potential energy.....


On 01/13/2017 12:14 PM, Carlos Simmerling wrote:
> Can you say more about what you mean by stable? Do they have a folded
> structure that unfolds? Or do you mean is R preferred over S?



_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Fri Jan 13 2017 - 03:30:04 PST
Custom Search