Re: [AMBER] All working now, except some trajectories

From: David Case <>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 14:57:32 -0500

On Wed, Jan 11, 2017, Erik Zuiderweg wrote:
> However, the Amber16 manual needs an update on leap; coming from
> Amber11, I had no idea why I could not embed my protein in a TIP3PBOX.
> Turns out that the water models are now in an other forcefield (since
> ???). Please update the manual!

Can you be more specific here? I've found some places where there was a
reference to the (old) WATBOX216. Is that what you mean? If there is a
specific page which is outdated, it would help us update things.


AMBER mailing list
Received on Wed Jan 11 2017 - 12:00:04 PST
Custom Search