Re: [AMBER] Parmchk2 and dihedral parameters

From: David A Case <>
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 10:02:26 -0500

On Tue, Dec 06, 2016, Andreas Gavrielides wrote:

> First of all thank you very much for your very valuable advice. In the
> second question to be more specific, I mean is it ok to use the general
> dihedral for all the parameters involving the -c3-c3- atoms as atoms 2
> and 3 and not take into account the specific dihedrals used or is it
> adviced to use the specific dihedrals produced by parmchk2?

I would use the specific dihedrals suggested by parmchk2. As always, treat
what antechamber/parmchk2 produce as suggestions that you may want to test
with more elaborate calculations.


AMBER mailing list
Received on Tue Dec 06 2016 - 07:30:02 PST
Custom Search