Re: [AMBER] Fullerene RESP charges derivation

From: FyD <fyd.q4md-forcefieldtools.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 11:01:13 +0200

Dear Fabio,

You could use PyRED at RED Server Dev.
http://q4md-forcefieldtools.org/REDServer-Development

the algorithm for chemical equivalencing does handle such type of structure

regards, Francois


Quoting Fabio Bologna <fabio.bologna2.studio.unibo.it>:

> Dear AMBER developers and users,
>
>
> I've computed the ESP charges for an endohedral metallofullerene (
> GdC82) using Gaussian09 and the following input line:
>
> PBEPBE/gen pseudo=read pop=(MK,readradii) iop(6/33=2) iop(6/42=6)
> SCF=Tight
> I've used the 6-31G* basis set for the carbon atoms and the
> effective core potential CEP-121G for the gadolinium atom. While the
> calculation has been successful, when I've tried to derive RESP
> charges using Antechamber with the following command:
>
> antechamber -fi gout -fo prepi -i name.log -o name.prepi -c resp
>
> I've received the error message:
>
>
> Info: the number of the path atoms exceeds MAXPATHATOMNUM(xxx) for
> atom [0], extend the size and reallocate the memory automatically.
>
>
> The message then continued to reappear no-stop, with the xxx number
> always growing and the atom number always 0. Does anyone know the
> reason for this behavior? Could it be that the structure of the
> carbon cage confuses the program because it doesn't have "a start
> and an end"?
>
>
> Thank you in advance for your precious time.
>
>
> Fabio Bologna, University of Bologna, Italy.


           F.-Y. Dupradeau
                 ---
http://q4md-forcefieldtools.org/FyD/


_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Tue Sep 20 2016 - 02:30:02 PDT
Custom Search