Re: [AMBER] comparing pytraj vs. sander output

From: Niel Henriksen <shireham.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 07:34:19 -0700

Hi Hai and Jason,

Thanks for the troubleshooting advice. I tried both suggestions. Rather
than read in the trajectory, via imin=5, I just did a single step energy
calculation on a netcdf restart file.

Sander EEL: -8225.6990
pt.energy_decomposition elec: -8225.7691
sander.energy_forces elec: -8225.6986

So going through pysander directly is indeed a closer match. Any concern
about the remaining difference? I can send you the files directly if you
would like.

Thanks,
--Niel
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Tue Sep 13 2016 - 08:00:03 PDT
Custom Search