[AMBER] historical changes to LYN charges in amber03
This message
: [
Message body
] [ More options (
top
,
bottom
) ]
Related messages
: [
Next message
] [
Previous message
] [
Next in thread
] [
Replies
]
Contemporary messages sorted
: [
by date
] [
by thread
] [
by subject
] [
by author
] [
by messages with attachments
]
From
: Mark Abraham <
mark.j.abraham.gmail.com
>
Date
: Mon, 05 Sep 2016 15:40:38 +0000
Hi,
Historically, amber99sb and amber03 had the same charges for LYN (e.g.
http://dev-archive.ambermd.org/200406/0002.html
), but in AMBER 14 and 16
they differ (see report by a GROMACS user at
https://redmine.gromacs.org/issues/2046
). The amber03 paper unfortunately
doesn't give any parameters for LYN (
http://ffamber.cnsm.csulb.edu/ffamber/pdfs/duan_AMBER03_2003jcc.pdf
). Is
there another / canonical source for the LYN parameters? Can anyone confirm
that there was a change in AMBER's definition at some point? Were there any
other changes alongside those for LYN?
I'd like to keep the AMBER and GROMACS implementations of AMBER force
fields in step with such fixes - is there any easy way to find what changes
have taken place in AMBER over the years?
Thanks!
Mark
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on
Mon Sep 05 2016 - 09:00:02 PDT
This message
: [
Message body
]
Next message
:
Carlos Simmerling: "Re: [AMBER] historical changes to LYN charges in amber03"
Previous message
:
Mark Abraham: "Re: [AMBER] GROMACS File Conversion Subtlety"
Next in thread
:
Carlos Simmerling: "Re: [AMBER] historical changes to LYN charges in amber03"
Maybe reply
:
Carlos Simmerling: "Re: [AMBER] historical changes to LYN charges in amber03"
Contemporary messages sorted
: [
by date
] [
by thread
] [
by subject
] [
by author
] [
by messages with attachments
]
Custom Search