Re: [AMBER] Question about QM/MM

From: Fabrício Bracht <fabracht1.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2016 14:03:30 -0300

Is there a reason, other than loosing previous velocity information, for
*not* minimizing the structures?


2016-09-02 13:17 GMT-03:00 Gustavo Seabra <gustavo.seabra.gmail.com>:

> Hi Anna,
>
> > I have already carried out a classical molecular dynamic of my system.
> Continuously, I want to perform a QM/MM minimization starting from one
> snapshot of the MD. How can I do it?
>
> In principle, if you have already run a classical MD on the system, all
> you have to do is tweak the mdin file with the new keywords for QM/MM and
> minimization, then using the restart file from the MD simulation as input
> structure. Very much as if you were just continuing a classical MD
> calculation. (Of course, take care of the points raised earlier by Adrian
> and Andreas.)
>
> However, if your goal is to run a QM/MM MD, IMHO you should *not* minimize
> the geometry all over again. Just turn on the QM hamiltonian and run for a
> while to adjust the system to the new hamiltonian, keeping the same
> ensemble variables as before. (You may nee to adjust dt for a smaller step
> size.)
>
> —
> Gustavo.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Fri Sep 02 2016 - 10:30:02 PDT
Custom Search