Thank you for your reply.
But in case of
>> ** No torsion terms for CT-NT-P-OS
>> ** No torsion terms for CT-NT-P-OS
>> ** No torsion terms for OS-P-NT-CT
>> ** No torsion terms for OS-P-NT-CT
I have the CT-NT-P-OS in my frcmod.known that I load, but amber still does not seem to recognize this. I do not really understand why? Because there is no problem for bonds, angles and other dihedrals that I have added to this file.
Best,
Cecilia
-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Ross [mailto:ross.cgl.ucsf.edu]
Sent: den 18 augusti 2016 08:41
To: AMBER Mailing List <amber.ambermd.org>
Subject: Re: [AMBER] MD simulation with non natural amino acid, parameterized using the RED server
The missing torsion terms are required, and you safest bet is to compare the existing ones in the relevant paper to the situation in your residue. You can run without the impropers, but might need to defend that choice, so good to give them equal consideration. You may be able to draw params by analogy with the standard residues without looking at the paper.
Bill
On 8/17/16 11:11 PM, Cecilia Lindgren wrote:
> Thank you for your reply.
>
> The commands I have given are:
>
> tleap -f leaprc.ff99SB
> parm = loadamberparams frcmod.known
> F02 = loadmol2 F02.mol2
> p = loadpdb protein.pdb
>> bond p.69.SG p.96.SG
>> bond p.257.SG p.272.SG
>> bond p.409.SG p.529.S
> saveamberparm protein.prmtop protein.inpcrd
>
> There are no errors after loading frcmod.known in leap.log. Later on, when I try to save the .prmtop and .inpcrd I get some warnings that says:
>
> Building improper torsion parameters.
> ** Warning: No sp2 improper torsion term for C*-CN-CB-CA
> atoms are: CG CE2 CD2 CE3
> ** Warning: No sp2 improper torsion term for NA-CA-CN-CB
> atoms are: NE1 CZ2 CE2 CD2
> ** Warning: No sp2 improper torsion term for C*-CN-CB-CA
> atoms are: CG CE2 CD2 CE3
>
> and so on. I attach the file.
>
>
> Best regards,
> Cecilia
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David A Case [mailto:david.case.rutgers.edu]
> Sent: den 17 augusti 2016 16:14
> To: AMBER Mailing List <amber.ambermd.org>
> Subject: Re: [AMBER] MD simulation with non natural amino acid, parameterized using the RED server
>
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2016, Cecilia Lindgren wrote:
>> Building proper torsion parameters.
>> ** No torsion terms for CT-NT-P-OS
>> ** No torsion terms for CT-NT-P-OS
>> ** No torsion terms for OS-P-NT-CT
>> ** No torsion terms for OS-P-NT-CT
>>
>> I am using ff99SB. There were some bonds, angles and dihedrals missing
>> when parameterizing, but I have used the analogous parameters from the
>> gaff force field, and received an frcmod file which I have uploaded,
>> and amber is not complaining about any other of those parameters. (One
>> of these that I have in the frcmod file is CT-NT-P-OS). I have
>> attached the frcmod.known file that I have used.
> Can you list the exact commands you gave to tleap? Have you carefully examined the leap.log file to see there are any messages relating the "loadAmberParams frcmod.known" command?
>
> ...dac
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Thu Aug 18 2016 - 02:00:06 PDT
