Re: [AMBER] parmchk vs parmchk2

From: Hannes Loeffler <>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 08:39:45 +0100

On Wed, 3 Aug 2016 17:34:34 -0600
David A Case <> wrote:

> 3. Generally, no one should use parmchk any more, although it might
> still work. I'm thinking of removing it from the amber16/bin
> directory; this would break some workflows (which is why this has not
> been done before now), but the danger of people using the wrong
> program probably outweighs the inconvenience of not having it
> around. Comments welcome.

I guess a sensible solution would be (and probably that's what you have
in mind) is to not compile and install parmchk by default anymore but
still distribute the source code (as long as it is possible to compile
it with a new release).

AMBER mailing list
Received on Mon Aug 15 2016 - 01:00:02 PDT
Custom Search