[AMBER] NMR restraint

From: Ming Tang <m21.tang.qut.edu.au>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 00:51:17 +0000

Dear list,

I want to pull my protein using constant force. I have been told that this is doable using flat-well potential with NMR restraint. I tried to understand what the flat-well potential is and how to apply NMR restraint. I use the following control and RST file:

SMD at constant force
&cntrl
  imin=0, irest=0, ntx=1,
  ntt=3, gamma_ln=2.0, temp0=310.0, tautp=1.0,
  ntc=2, ntf=2, ntb=2, ntp=1, pres0=1.0, taup=2.0, barostat=1
  cut=10.0, iwrap=1, ig=-1,
  ntpr=100, ntwr=100, ntwx=100
  nstlim=150000000, dt=0.002,
  ntr=1, restraintmask=".5,399,756", restraint_wt=1000
  ioutfm=1, nmropt=1,
/
  &wt type='DUMPFREQ', istep1=100 /
  &wt type='END' /
  DISANG=DISANG.f
  DUMPAVE=dist_vs_t

DISANG=DISANG.f
&rst
    iat=-1,-1,
    iresid=0,ifvari=0,ir6=0,ifntyp=0,ialtd=0,
    r3=83, r4=84.945,rk3=500,
    igr1=5,399,756
    igr2=386,743,1137
&end

I want to apply constant force between the centre of mass (COM) of 2 group of atoms. The initial distance between the COM of the 2 groups is 84.945. I want to stretch the protein at the COM of the 2 groups using constant force, which I think is equal to 2*rk3*(r4-r3) when the distance between the COM of the 2 groups is larger than r4. Under constant pulling force, the distance between the COM of the 2 groups should increase. However, from my dist_vs_t file, the distance between the COM of the 2 groups is decreasing from 84.945.

Is my understanding and my control and RST file correct?

Any help and guidance is appreciated.

_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Sun Jul 24 2016 - 18:00:02 PDT
Custom Search